tags 418058 - unreproducible
retitle 418058 iconv: half-smart on ascii compatible code conversion (shift-jis)
thanks
Let me update with better data since original report was contaminated
with other bugs such as groff. (Thanks Aurelien Jarno to checking them.)
Bug: The \ and ~ (ascii 92 126)are no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 418058 - unreproducible
Bug#418058: iconv: half-smart on ascii compatible code conversion (latin1,
shift-jis, ...)
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
> retitle 418058 iconv: half-smart on ascii compatible code conversion
> (s
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> linux-libc-dev should not directly export a kernel structure. Either
>> remove it or use #ifdef __KERNEL__, but don't bother us with that.
>
> It is part of the userspace interface which is redefined in
> bits/ustat.h.
>
> Anyway, it is no bug in the ke
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 429064
Bug#429064: linux-libc-dev: conflicts with
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
reopen 429064
thanks
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 09:22:12PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The glibc is correct here. If you don't want to get the bug assigned on
> linux-2.6, then I am closing the bug.
The reported problem does still exist, so closing this bug is shoving a
real problem under the car
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:22:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429064: linux-libc-dev: conflicts with
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 429064 libc6-dev
Bug#429064: linux-libc-dev: conflicts with
Bug reassigned from package `linux-libc-dev' to `libc6-dev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 429064 linux-libc-dev
Bug#429064: linux-libc-dev: conflicts with
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `linux-libc-dev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 429064 libc6-dev
Bug#429064: linux-libc-dev: conflicts with
Bug reassigned from package `linux-libc-dev' to `libc6-dev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Please cc me.
I saw 427990 for hppa and it made me question whether the following
could be related for m68k?
What do ya'll think?
Thanks,
Stephen
- Forwarded message from Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTE
Aurelien Jarno schrieb:
> Jög Sommer a èrit :
> > I would like to build the newest libc6 package for powerpc, but I get this:
> >
> > % CC=gcc-4.2 nice dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -nc
>
> CC= does not work the way you use it. This is probably the cause of your
> problem. You have to add this
reopen 429021
thanks
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:33:40PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:09:42PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > The bug is here, you should set the flags to SA_RESTART so that
> > interupted syscalls are restarted. If you don't do so you'll break th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 429021
Bug#429021: libc6: fputs can lose data in buffer on signal
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:09:42PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> The bug is here, you should set the flags to SA_RESTART so that
> interupted syscalls are restarted. If you don't do so you'll break the
> libio.
Is this documented anywhere? The manual says that EINTR is treated as
an ordinary
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 429021 normal
Bug#429021: libc6: fputs can lose data in buffer on signal
Severity set to `normal' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:09:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429021: libc6: fputs can lose data in buffer on signal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13
Severity: important
fputs (and probably other FILE based output functions) can lose
previously written data that were accumulated in the user space
buffer when a signal arrives. Here is an example that demonstrates
the problem:
# cat t.c
/
Pierre Habouzit dixit:
>exists, so it's definitely a ksh only issue, and is not worth a stable
>update.
>
> The fix will appear in the soon to be uploaded 2.6 packages though.
That is okay, as mksh only offers to be used as /bin/sh via debconf
in the package currently in unstable, and the other
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 10:08:30PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: nscd
> Version: 2.3.6.ds1-8
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> I've reported a similar bug to the sendmail-bin postinst script
> some time ago, you'll find it at
> | http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Author: madcoder
Date: 2007-06-15 10:12:23 + (Fri, 15 Jun 2007)
New Revision: 2367
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/changelog
glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.6/debian/debhelper.in/nscd.init
Log:
Closes 428884
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Modified:
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
> #4 0x2ae2a514e21e in free () from /lib/libc.so.6
> No symbol table info available.
> #5 0x2ae2a51d974a in nscd_getpw_r () from /lib/libc.so.6
> No symbol table info available.
[...]
> So it appears the breakage is in nscd. Let me know you if the
21 matches
Mail list logo
