Bug#751565: libc: clock regression from wheezy on kfreebsd

2014-06-14 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Package: libc0.1 Version: 2.19-1 Severity: important Control: block 751547 by -1 It seems that clock now always returns -1 on kfreebsd. Take the following example: #include #include #include #include int main() { clock_t t = clock(); printf("clock: %" PRIiMAX "\n", (intmax_t)t); } Runni

Bug#751565: libc: clock regression from wheezy on kfreebsd

2014-06-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 12:10:15PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Package: libc0.1 > Version: 2.19-1 > Severity: important > Control: block 751547 by -1 > > It seems that clock now always returns -1 on kfreebsd. Take the > following example: > > #include > #include > #include > #include >

Bug#751565: libc: clock regression from wheezy on kfreebsd

2014-06-15 Thread Petr Salinger
notfound 751565 2.18-7 The regression is due to 2013-12-17 Joseph Myers * sysdeps/unix/bsd/bits/posix_opt.h: Remove file. * sysdeps/unix/bsd/clock.c: Likewise. * sysdeps/unix/bsd/times.c: Likewise. I will resurrect the clock.c file into kfreebsd specific sysdeps, and I will look at other de