On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 07:55:00AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> OK, sorry for the confusion but I really didn't want to see Aurélien
> just stop this work which I'm pretty sure he's doing well.
>
> For dpkg, I think I've seen some discussion but Guillem Jover and/or
> Frank Lichtenheld have p
(restricting the CC list to real lists)
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 07:45:16AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > > After a discussion on IRC, it seems there is no consensus about how
> > > multiarch should be done. Therefore I stop working on that (p
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 07:45:16AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > After a discussion on IRC, it seems there is no consensus about how
> > multiarch should be done. Therefore I stop working on that (patches are
> > still welcome for glibc).
> Is this really the best thing to do?
> Even tho
> After a discussion on IRC, it seems there is no consensus about how
> multiarch should be done. Therefore I stop working on that (patches are
> still welcome for glibc).
Is this really the best thing to do?
Even though there is no consensus (I overread the thread and anyway
most parts of it
Bdale Garbee writes:
> On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 01:12 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > The only change planned is to make libc6-dev-i386 and libc6-i386 provide
> > a glibc on amd64 instead of ia32-libs. It will be in /emul/ia32-linux (I
> > still have to find how to do that cleanly in the debhelp
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 01:12 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The only change planned is to make libc6-dev-i386 and libc6-i386 provide
> a glibc on amd64 instead of ia32-libs. It will be in /emul/ia32-linux (I
> still have to find how to do that cleanly in the debhelper files).
>
> Bdale, do you a
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:58:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Some update on this, as we have evolved a lot since the last mail.
Bdale Garbee a écrit :
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 07:10 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Moving 32-bit libraries to (/usr)/lib32 won't mak
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:58:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Some update on this, as we have evolved a lot since the last mail.
> Bdale Garbee a écrit :
> >On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 07:10 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Moving 32-bit libraries to (/usr)/lib32 won't make the amd64 port
Hi!
Some update on this, as we have evolved a lot since the last mail.
Bdale Garbee a écrit :
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 07:10 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Moving 32-bit libraries to (/usr)/lib32 won't make the amd64 port
compliant with the FHS, which is almost impossible given the current
setup
9 matches
Mail list logo
