I forgot to reply to the list
On 06/04/14 09:15, Marcelo Lacerda wrote:
Nope, and I couldn't upgrade it, I guess thats due to apt not trusting
the package list in the first place. I had to manually download and
install the package to make apt work again. Is this the standard procedure?
On 06/04
Robert Millan (2014-06-07):
> On 02/06/14 20:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > May I ask what was broken on gdm3 and gnome-shell to have caused all
> > these removals?
>
> Long-standing RC bugs in GDM3 [1], and your choice of making gnome-shell
> depend on it.
>
> Combined with Release Teams
Package: gnome-core
Severity: serious
On 02/06/14 19:56, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
And I wonder if we could adjust gnome-core's dependency from:
gnome-session (>= 3.4),
to:
gnome-session (>= 3.4) [linux-any],
gnome-session-bin (>= 3.4) [!linux-any],
That would imply that gnome-core still achi
On 02/06/14 19:56, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
We'll need to make gnome-session Architecture: linux-any and remove it.
Note that it's currently Architecture: all, so I'm not sure this is
necessary. AFAIK it's generally accepted to use Architecture: all for
kernel-specific or cpu-specific packages
On 02/06/14 20:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
May I ask what was broken on gdm3 and gnome-shell to have caused all these
removals?
Long-standing RC bugs in GDM3 [1], and your choice of making gnome-shell
depend on it.
Combined with Release Teams ruling that including GDM3 in Debian GNU/kFre
On 02/06/14 14:13, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
You'd find that the default configuration is unusable under non-GNOME
(and thus now for all hurd and kfreebsd users).
We can't ship unusable software in Jessie. As per -release mandate kfreebsd-*
is no exception anymore.
It's already been stablished
6 matches
Mail list logo