Thanks for everyone for suggestions.
I have used Listen and VirtualHosts directives.
Let me show you my dns files for two sites:
First one is primary which is, say abc.net
the second one is VirtualHost xyz.net.
The dns files resides on server ns1.abc.net
the first dns file is abc.hosts and foll
Hello all.
I have been playing around with CBQ, cbq.init et al for a while, and
have got some impressive results. It works after all!... I have used SFQ
as the leaf queuing discipline on all my classes and created a bounded
class with the total bandwidth I wanted to share (64K), from which
unboun
The original question was about IP based virtual
hosts. These are the settings for name based
virtual host.
Correct, though.
Still I prefer to have the IP in the virtual
host directive. Reduces DNS traffic somewhat
and is more reliable as far as I can tell.
Apache by default responds to *all*
Erich Kolb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3 Apr 2001, at 11:10:
> Dont you still have to add DNS entries?
Well, sure...
Without a DNS entry no request would reach your server.
Cheers, Marcel
> -Original Message-
> From: Y2KNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:43 AM
> To
> Listen 192.55.34.5:80
> NameVirtualHost 192.55.34.5:80
>
>
> DocumentRoot /var/www/xyz
> ServerName www.xyz.net
>
NameVirtualHost means that you're defining the virtual hosts by name. Change
the VirtualHost line to read:
And make sure you use:
ServerName xyz.net
ServerAlias www.xyz.ne
Note the difference between
and
The first is the setting for name based
virtual hosts, i.e. various virtual hosts
sharing one IP (make sure you have one or
many "NameVirtualHost 10.0.0.1" as well)
- in contrast to ip based virtual host
where each virtual host has it's own IP.
Cheers, Marcel
Thanks for everyone for suggestions.
I have used Listen and VirtualHosts directives.
Let me show you my dns files for two sites:
First one is primary which is, say abc.net
the second one is VirtualHost xyz.net.
The dns files resides on server ns1.abc.net
the first dns file is abc.hosts and fol
On Tue, 3 Apr 101, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> can someone recommend a voip program I can use in Linux from the command
> line?
Andy Cater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> supplies the following:
www.openh323.org - command line client for quicknet for Linux
HTH
--
Martin Wheeler -StarTEXT -
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:42:01AM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> Sendmail *is* the kitchen sink of MTAs [...]
if sendmail is the kitchen-sink then postfix is the dish-washer. an
hour of drudgery with your hands in filthy water versus push-button
automation.
:-)
craig
--
craig sanders <[EMAIL
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:42:01AM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > * it's slow.
> > * it doesn't scale well.
>
> Short: FUD, spread by one who's not kept up with current developements -
> Look at whats being done in 8.12 wrt multi-queues and
> multi-ru
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:42:01AM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> Mixing/matching of DB, LDAP, text, HESIOD, PH (not on Debian), etc.
> for *ANY* map: aliases, access, etc.
Ah, but postfix does that, and does it better, adding posix and pcre
regex's and SQL or whatever to the mix.
> Why suffer
On Tue, 3 Apr 101, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> can someone recommend a voip program I can use in Linux from the command
> line?
Andy Cater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> supplies the following:
www.openh323.org - command line client for quicknet for Linux
HTH
--
Martin Wheeler -StarTEXT -
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:42:01AM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> Sendmail *is* the kitchen sink of MTAs [...]
if sendmail is the kitchen-sink then postfix is the dish-washer. an
hour of drudgery with your hands in filthy water versus push-button
automation.
:-)
craig
--
craig sanders <[EMAI
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:42:01AM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > * it's slow.
> > * it doesn't scale well.
>
> Short: FUD, spread by one who's not kept up with current developements -
> Look at whats being done in 8.12 wrt multi-queues and
> multi-r
can someone recommend a voip program I can use in Linux from the command
line?
e.g.
voicecall ip
and it brings up textmode app to talk over the line
I'm blind and don't want to mess with windows or X.
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:42:01AM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> Mixing/matching of DB, LDAP, text, HESIOD, PH (not on Debian), etc.
> for *ANY* map: aliases, access, etc.
Ah, but postfix does that, and does it better, adding posix and pcre
regex's and SQL or whatever to the mix.
> Why suffer
Hi Abel, hi Peter,
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Peter Billson wrote:
> Abel Gascón wrote:
> >
> > I would like someone recommends me the best free Fax server and tell me
> > something about features.
> >
> > Thanks in advance, Abel
>
> I like Hylafax ( http://www.hylafax.org ).
>
> - Easy to configu
Abel Gascón wrote:
>
> I would like someone recommends me the best free Fax server and tell me
> something about features.
>
> Thanks in advance, Abel
I like Hylafax ( http://www.hylafax.org ).
- Easy to configure
- Works with basically all modems
- Supports multiple modems per server
- Al
I would like someone recommends me the best free Fax server and tell me
something about features.
Thanks in advance, Abel
I sent you a linux.mc. I am missing in the debian-stuff quickinfos like the
docomentations *in* the conf-files. Or the SuSE-Database. This is very helpful.
Of
course I have the famous sendmail-book.
By the way, I tried the make with 'procmail' - the server refuses mails from
outside. I copied ba
can someone recommend a voip program I can use in Linux from the command
line?
e.g.
voicecall ip
and it brings up textmode app to talk over the line
I'm blind and don't want to mess with windows or X.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:24:36PM -0400, Peter Billson wrote:
> > I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to put
> > more IP based virtual hosts. I have used
> > the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP number
> > to each site. But when I tried to look on the Virtual host
> > site, it brin
Aha, thanx for the explanation. I am an experianced SuSE administrator and I
feel pretty firm in the sendmail.cf. I start prefering debian now (as a
Server ;-) - but I miss the documentation... It took me hours to find out,
that the configuratuion of procmail in the sendmail.cf is missing. After
I haven't really followed this discussion so this might have been said.
I have this configuration for apache:
You must set a NameVirtualHost
NameVirtualHost 204.73.64.54
ServerName company.com
ServerAlias company.com www.company.com
DocumentRoot /var/virtual/company
ErrorLog /var/log/apac
> I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to put
> more IP based virtual hosts. I have used
> the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP number
> to each site. But when I tried to look on the Virtual host
> site, it brings the primary site.
>
> I will appreciate, if I get information about h
Do you sleep ???
Open your eyes !!!
Am 09:43 03.04.2001 -0500 haben Y2KNET geschrieben:
>
>I have used the same configuration:
>
>
^^^
Use the IP address !!!
>ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>DocumentRoot /groups/smallco/www
>ServerName www.smallc
Dont you still have to add DNS entries?
-Original Message-
From: Y2KNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
I have used the same configuration:
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Abel, hi Peter,
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Peter Billson wrote:
> Abel Gascón wrote:
> >
> > I would like someone recommends me the best free Fax server and tell me
> > something about features.
> >
> > Thanks in advance, Abel
>
> I like Hylafax ( http://www.hylafax.org ).
>
> - Easy to config
Abel Gascón wrote:
>
> I would like someone recommends me the best free Fax server and tell me
> something about features.
>
> Thanks in advance, Abel
I like Hylafax ( http://www.hylafax.org ).
- Easy to configure
- Works with basically all modems
- Supports multiple modems per server
- A
I have used the same configuration:
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DocumentRoot /groups/smallco/www
ServerName www.smallco.com
ErrorLog /groups/smallco/logs/error_log
TransferLog /groups/smallco/logs/access_log
But still it loads the primary site.
- Original Message
I would like someone recommends me the best free Fax server and tell me
something about features.
Thanks in advance, Abel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I sent you a linux.mc. I am missing in the debian-stuff quickinfos like the
docomentations *in* the conf-files. Or the SuSE-Database. This is very helpful. Of
course I have the famous sendmail-book.
By the way, I tried the make with 'procmail' - the server refuses mails from
outside. I copied ba
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:24:36PM -0400, Peter Billson wrote:
> > I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to put
> > more IP based virtual hosts. I have used
> > the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP number
> > to each site. But when I tried to look on the Virtual host
> > site, it bri
Aha, thanx for the explanation. I am an experianced SuSE administrator and I
feel pretty firm in the sendmail.cf. I start prefering debian now (as a
Server ;-) - but I miss the documentation... It took me hours to find out,
that the configuratuion of procmail in the sendmail.cf is missing. After
I haven't really followed this discussion so this might have been said.
I have this configuration for apache:
You must set a NameVirtualHost
NameVirtualHost 204.73.64.54
ServerName company.com
ServerAlias company.com www.company.com
DocumentRoot /var/virtual/company
ErrorLog /var/log/apa
> I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to put
> more IP based virtual hosts. I have used
> the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP number
> to each site. But when I tried to look on the Virtual host
> site, it brings the primary site.
>
> I will appreciate, if I get information about
Do you sleep ???
Open your eyes !!!
Am 09:43 03.04.2001 -0500 haben Y2KNET geschrieben:
>
>I have used the same configuration:
>
>
^^^
Use the IP address !!!
>ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>DocumentRoot /groups/smallco/www
>ServerName www.small
Dont you still have to add DNS entries?
-Original Message-
From: Y2KNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
I have used the same configuration:
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Docume
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/index.html
esp.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/ip-based.html
basically use something like
ServerName www.abc.dom
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DocumentRoot /www/abc
Cheers, Marcel
Y2KNET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3 Apr 2001, at 8:37:
> I have ins
I have used the same configuration:
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DocumentRoot /groups/smallco/www
ServerName www.smallco.com
ErrorLog /groups/smallco/logs/error_log
TransferLog /groups/smallco/logs/access_log
But still it loads the primary site.
- Original Message
I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to
put
more IP based virtual hosts. I have
used
the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP
number
to each site. But when I tried to look on the
Virtual host
site, it brings the primary site.
I will appreciate, if I get information about how
to
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 07:11:06AM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
> So, what happened to sendmail? How did it earn it's fall from grace?
> When I got into it, sendmail was it. I've never looked closely at the
> mail system since.
* it's slow.
* it doesn't scale well.
if you've ever seen sendmail b
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/index.html
esp.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/ip-based.html
basically use something like
ServerName www.abc.dom
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DocumentRoot /www/abc
Cheers, Marcel
Y2KNET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3 Apr 2001, at 8:37:
> I have in
I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and now trying to
put
more IP based virtual hosts. I have
used
the VirtualHost directives, and gave the IP
number
to each site. But when I tried to look on the
Virtual host
site, it brings the primary site.
I will appreciate, if I get information about how
to
So, what happened to sendmail? How did it earn it's fall from grace? When
I got into it, sendmail was it. I've never looked closely at the mail
system since.
---==---
___/``\___
0100
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 07:11:06AM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
> So, what happened to sendmail? How did it earn it's fall from grace?
> When I got into it, sendmail was it. I've never looked closely at the
> mail system since.
* it's slow.
* it doesn't scale well.
if you've ever seen sendmail
So, what happened to sendmail? How did it earn it's fall from grace? When
I got into it, sendmail was it. I've never looked closely at the mail
system since.
---==---
___/``\___
0100
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 04:45:40PM -0400, Felipe Alvarez Harnecker wrote:
> >
> >
> > Subject says it all.
> >
> > I'm using ssh and telnet-ssl for remote logins but i have some users
> > that shoud do a local login.
>
> Maybe you could whip up a little shell script to check the tty
Richard A Nelson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Martin Tanzer wrote:
>
> > I changed in /etc/mail/sendmail.mc:
> >
> > OSTYPE(mklinux)dnl
>
> while ( ! nauseated ) { print "Don't do this" };
hmmm. Why?
martin
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:31:27AM -0400, Haim Dimermanas wrote:
> Foreword : I *really* don't want to start a flame war on that. I
> am just _very_ curious. I am currently using Exim. I don't really
> know a whole lot about it. I just think that it's nice to have a
> human readable config file and
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 02:20:51PM +0900, ARAKI Yasuhiro wrote:
> Folks,
>
> > > postfix is also faster than qmail. and more flexible. and with much
> > > better anti-spam features.
> >
> > Could you elaborate on that?
>
> Postfix use piggyback mail transfer.
> If two or more recipients are in
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Haim Dimermanas wrote:
> - Ease of configuration. I don't want to read a whole book to find out how I
> can enable relay for a range of IP. The fact that it is sendmail compatible
> scares me on that one.
Postfix's configuration files and syntax are entirely different than
sen
Folks,
Subject: Re: sendmail is slow for mass mail
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 00:31:27 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> - Ease of configuration. I don't want to read a whole book to find out how I
> can enable relay for a range of IP. The fact that it is sendmail compatible
> scares me on that
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 04:45:40PM -0400, Felipe Alvarez Harnecker wrote:
> >
> >
> > Subject says it all.
> >
> > I'm using ssh and telnet-ssl for remote logins but i have some users
> > that shoud do a local login.
>
> Maybe you could whip up a little shell script to check the tty
Richard A Nelson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Martin Tanzer wrote:
>
> > I changed in /etc/mail/sendmail.mc:
> >
> > OSTYPE(mklinux)dnl
>
> while ( ! nauseated ) { print "Don't do this" };
hmmm. Why?
martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
55 matches
Mail list logo
