We are back to needing to upgrade perl on one of our mail servers. The
version perl-5.8.1.tar.gz is being called for one our apps needed.
I am sure I am not the first to run into this on production servers and
wondered what approach other folks take ?
Thanks,
Dee
--
W.D.McKinney (Dee)
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 16:14, Rod Rodolico wrote:
You could install the CPAN module on your current system, then use it to update Perl.
CAVEAT: CPAN and Debian have, in the past, placed Perl in two separate locations.
When I did
this before, I did have a problem configuring Perl correctly
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 17:40, Rod Rodolico wrote:
Is there a way to tell apt (dselect) you have certain packages installed? If so, it
would make
sense to just trash the Debian perl install and install it all from source. I agree
with your
Perl guru -- roll your own is the best way to go. I
Sure hope you like Postfix better. It's PITB when you don't get along
with your MTA. Best Wishes.
Dee
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 07:44, Cameron Moore wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Sanders) [2003.09.07 20:55]:
qmail is so different to sendmail, exim, postfix, and just about every other
unix
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:43:33PM +1000, Rudi Starcevic wrote:
Sendmail or Qmail ? That is my question.
Well Rudi,
You have heard from most camps of users who prefer MTA's for various
reasons. Interesting enough, Debian ships exim default, and uses Mailman
for it's Debian hosted lists,
Hmm.
Since '98 ...good for you.
All the patches in the world don't help some folks anyway.Qmail has many
ways to skin a cat.
In the end, it's pick a horse and ride it. Exim, Postfix, Sendmail and
qmail all have querks. Like the Mutt homepage, All mail clients suck.
This one just sucks less.
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 14:54, martin f krafft wrote:
- qmail isn't available as a binary package for Debian
Wrong. See http://smarden.org/pape/Debian/
.
- qmail support includes being flamed by the author
Wrong. Ask a question and find out. Many helpful people who don't flame
but as they
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 04:58, Eric Sproul wrote:
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 01:43, Rudi Starcevic wrote:
Hi,
Sorry to bother you all with this repeat question.
I've have searched around and seen plenty of opinions but I'd like to
ask again and get the latest from this list.
Sendmail or
Good for you and good choice. Try http://www.tldp.org for starters.
Have fun !
Dee
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 20:13, Anil Gupte wrote:
Hi all!
I am newbie to Linux, and decide to throw my lot in with Debian. I always
learned by asking questions, so I hope you won't mind newbie questions here.
and djb is not compatible with working OSes. :)
As in which OS that is not compatible ? And Bind is ?
Dee
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 05:06:39PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
It is partly a matter of taste.
- v8 is faster
- v8 is
Question: We run sslwrap for POP3 wrapping and I see Outlook for XP when
selecting Advanced Options and using SSL enabled for both SMTP and POP
connections, that with Ethereal the clear text password is still there
in view ?
Is this an SSL issue or an Outlook bug ?
Previous verions of
Question: We run sslwrap for POP3 wrapping and I see Outlook for XP when
selecting Advanced Options and using SSL enabled for both SMTP and POP
connections, that with Ethereal the clear text password is still there
in view ?
Is this an SSL issue or an Outlook bug ?
Previous verions of
Maybe reading a little deeper (broader) on the website and you could
answer that question. :-(
http://www.whichssl.com/html/who/index.html
Dee
W.D.McKinney (Dee)
Alaska Wireless Systems
http://3233667600
On Sun, 2003-05-25 at 04:15, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2003 12:32:33 +0200,
On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 07:10, Ana Paula Sabelli wrote:
Hi,
I´m setting up a mail server, I ´d like to hear opinions about which
one is better.
TIA
Ana Paula Sabelli
OK, it's a sysadmin preference type isssue for sure. Having run
Sendmail, Exim, Postfix, qmail and atmail, we have settled
14 matches
Mail list logo
