Nick Jennings wrote:
This brings up a question I have. Isn't testing technically the *last*
of stable/testing/unstable to get security fixes?
Correct.
security fixes for stable are packported immediately, and the fixes are
also incorporated into unstable asap. Now for testing, there would be
a
This brings up a question I have. Isn't testing technically the *last*
of stable/testing/unstable to get security fixes?
security fixes for stable are packported immediately, and the fixes are
also incorporated into unstable asap. Now for testing, there would be
at least a delay of a week for it
Nick Jennings wrote:
> This brings up a question I have. Isn't testing technically the *last*
> of stable/testing/unstable to get security fixes?
Correct.
> security fixes for stable are packported immediately, and the fixes are
> also incorporated into unstable asap. Now for testing,
This brings up a question I have. Isn't testing technically the *last*
of stable/testing/unstable to get security fixes?
security fixes for stable are packported immediately, and the fixes are
also incorporated into unstable asap. Now for testing, there would be
at least a delay of a week for it
> Anyway, thats our take on it... and its never failed us so far. Takes
> quite a bit of effort though... so watch out.
Just to chime in, we use stable only, with quite a few backports. [1] Often
enough there's a package I'd really like - right now it's a fresh postfix -
but I find greater stabi
You just don't know what you're missing...
till you run unstable.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: stable vs testing
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 10:30:56AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > O
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 10:30:56AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 03:32:29AM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
> > We run unstable on our production servers. That means we must be very
> > vigilant in making sure no one else has had a problem. We download
> > the updates, and install t
You just don't know what you're missing...
till you run unstable.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: stable vs testing
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 10:30:56AM +1100, Craig
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 10:30:56AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 03:32:29AM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
> > We run unstable on our production servers. That means we must be very
> > vigilant in making sure no one else has had a problem. We download
> > the updates, and install
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 03:32:29AM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
> We run unstable on our production servers. That means we must be very
> vigilant in making sure no one else has had a problem. We download
> the updates, and install them a day or two later after other people
> have tested it and made sur
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 03:32:29AM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
> We run unstable on our production servers. That means we must be very
> vigilant in making sure no one else has had a problem. We download
> the updates, and install them a day or two later after other people
> have tested it and made su
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Glenn Hocking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:58 AM
Subject: Re: stable vs testing
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Glenn Hocking wrote:
>
> > My question is what other experiences have others have running
> > tes
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Glenn Hocking wrote:
> My question is what other experiences have others have running
> testing/unstable in a live environment with regards to both security and
> stability.
unstable is very much a "trust this and die" environment.
NOT recommended for a critically live install
Glenn Hocking wrote:
> My question is what other experiences have others have running
> testing/unstable in a live environment with regards to both security and
> stability.
I use ONLY testing/unstable. Had never any problems with woody. I use
widely known software like apache, bind, postfix & so
Title: RE: stable vs testing
I have two boxes running testing, and they rock!! But If you plan to use the box for production, I always recommend you the stable.think on security issues in the future.
Un saludo.
-Mensaje original-
De: Glenn Hocking [mailto
15 matches
Mail list logo
