Re: IMAP before relay (was: pop before smtp relay)

2004-06-21 Thread Dale E Martin
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:26:48AM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote: > Ward Willats wrote: > > >Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique > >server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank > >you, with no existing client configuration changes. > > Anyone

Re: IMAP before relay (was: pop before smtp relay)

2004-06-21 Thread Dale E Martin
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:26:48AM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote: > Ward Willats wrote: > > >Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique > >server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank > >you, with no existing client configuration changes. > > Anyone

Re: IMAP before relay (was: pop before smtp relay)

2004-06-21 Thread Marcel Hicking
--Sunday, June 20, 2004 00:26:48 -0600 Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ward Willats wrote: > >> Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a >> boutique server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works >> very well, thank you, with no existing client configuration >> cha

Re: IMAP before relay (was: pop before smtp relay)

2004-06-21 Thread Marcel Hicking
--Sunday, June 20, 2004 00:26:48 -0600 Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ward Willats wrote: > >> Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a >> boutique server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works >> very well, thank you, with no existing client configuration >> cha

Re: IMAP before relay (was: pop before smtp relay)

2004-06-20 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le dim 20/06/2004 à 08:26, Nate Duehr a écrit : > Ward Willats wrote: > > > Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique > > server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank > > you, with no existing client configuration changes. > > Anyone know of

Re: IMAP before relay (was: pop before smtp relay)

2004-06-20 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le dim 20/06/2004 à 08:26, Nate Duehr a écrit : > Ward Willats wrote: > > > Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique > > server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank > > you, with no existing client configuration changes. > > Anyone know of