On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:26:48AM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote:
> Ward Willats wrote:
>
> >Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique
> >server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank
> >you, with no existing client configuration changes.
>
> Anyone
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:26:48AM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote:
> Ward Willats wrote:
>
> >Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique
> >server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank
> >you, with no existing client configuration changes.
>
> Anyone
--Sunday, June 20, 2004 00:26:48 -0600 Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ward Willats wrote:
>
>> Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a
>> boutique server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works
>> very well, thank you, with no existing client configuration
>> cha
--Sunday, June 20, 2004 00:26:48 -0600 Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ward Willats wrote:
>
>> Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a
>> boutique server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works
>> very well, thank you, with no existing client configuration
>> cha
Le dim 20/06/2004 à 08:26, Nate Duehr a écrit :
> Ward Willats wrote:
>
> > Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique
> > server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank
> > you, with no existing client configuration changes.
>
> Anyone know of
Le dim 20/06/2004 à 08:26, Nate Duehr a écrit :
> Ward Willats wrote:
>
> > Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique
> > server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank
> > you, with no existing client configuration changes.
>
> Anyone know of
6 matches
Mail list logo