Re: apt-get upgrade

2004-10-27 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 09:20:26AM +1300, Johnno wrote: > > dpkg package is install, any ideas? > One main suggestion: use an appropriate list, you are OT here. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR

Re: apt-get upgrade

2004-10-24 Thread Steve Kemp
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 09:20:26AM +1300, Johnno wrote: > When I do a apt-get upgrade on one the the servers here I get this error > message: > > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] > dpkg: `ldconfig' not found on PATH. > dpkg: `start-stop-daemon' not found on PATH. > dpkg: `install-info' not found on

Re: apt-get upgrade

2004-10-24 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Johnno wrote: > NB: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin. [...] > dpkg package is install, any ideas? What's the content of your root's $PATH? Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO

Re: apt-get upgrade

2004-10-24 Thread Doug Griswold
echo $PATH as root and see if /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin are in root's path. If they are maybe you issued "su" instead of "su -". >>> "Johnno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/24/04 4:20 PM >>> Hello When I do a apt-get upgrade on one the the servers here I get this error message: Do you want t

Re: apt-get upgrade

2004-10-24 Thread Gaddis, Jeremy L.
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 16:20, Johnno wrote: > Hello > > When I do a apt-get upgrade on one the the servers here I get this error > message: [snip] > NB: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin. export PATH=$PATH:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin Preferably that'd b

Re: apt-get upgrade or .tgz

2004-03-03 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:03:51AM -0500, Andrew P. Kaplan wrote: > I have an old version of Postfix running on my Debian box. I don't remember > if I used apt-get or installed from a .tgz file. If I use apt-get install I > am concerned I could end up with two version of Postfix. What's the best wa

Re: apt-get upgrade or .tgz

2004-03-03 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:03:51AM -0500, Andrew P. Kaplan wrote: > I have an old version of Postfix running on my Debian box. I don't remember > if I used apt-get or installed from a .tgz file. If I use apt-get install I > am concerned I could end up with two version of Postfix. What's the best wa

Re: apt-get upgrade or .tgz

2004-03-03 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 14:03, Andrew P. Kaplan wrote: > I have an old version of Postfix running on my Debian box. I don't remember > if I used apt-get or installed from a .tgz file. If I use apt-get install I > am concerned I could end up with two version of Postfix. What's the best way > to upgrad

Re: apt-get upgrade or .tgz

2004-03-03 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 14:03, Andrew P. Kaplan wrote: > I have an old version of Postfix running on my Debian box. I don't remember > if I used apt-get or installed from a .tgz file. If I use apt-get install I > am concerned I could end up with two version of Postfix. What's the best way > to upgrad

Re: apt-get upgrade installs unnecessary users / Cobalt RaQ 3i

2001-02-05 Thread brian moore
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:16:02PM +0100, H.P. Stroebel wrote: > hi list, > > 1) i switched recently from redhat to debian for an internet server > installation A very good move. MUCH easier to maintain. > i deleted unnecessary users and groups like games, audio etc., but they > were reinstalle

Re: apt-get upgrade installs unnecessary users / Cobalt RaQ 3i

2001-02-05 Thread brian moore
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:16:02PM +0100, H.P. Stroebel wrote: > hi list, > > 1) i switched recently from redhat to debian for an internet server > installation A very good move. MUCH easier to maintain. > i deleted unnecessary users and groups like games, audio etc., but they > were reinstall