Hey Haim,
Thursday, June 28, 2001, 5:16:05 PM, you wrote:
>> HD> So using that patch makes the "." part of a valid username. What do I do
>> HD> about the '@' in the email address?
>>
>> AFAIK, the '@' is already a valid character in the Cyrus mailbox namespace.
HD> Great!
HD> Now I have
* This one time, at band camp, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. said:
> Technically, the '.' is already a legal character in mailbox names, but it
> does
> something funky (I don't recall quite what it is/was), but the patch curbs
> that
> behaviour.
>
IIRC it allows you to specifiy which IMAP folder the me
Hey Haim,
Thursday, June 28, 2001, 4:42:46 PM, you wrote:
HD> Kevin,
>> If you apply Dave Fuchs' patch to make a '.' a valid character (but making
>> '/'
>> and invalid one), then that becomes a valid Cyrus username. Search the Cyrus
>> IMAP mailing list archives for it. He sent it out for 2
Hey Haim,
Thursday, June 28, 2001, 5:16:05 PM, you wrote:
>> HD> So using that patch makes the "." part of a valid username. What do I do
>> HD> about the '@' in the email address?
>>
>> AFAIK, the '@' is already a valid character in the Cyrus mailbox namespace.
HD> Great!
HD> Now I have
* This one time, at band camp, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. said:
> Technically, the '.' is already a legal character in mailbox names, but it does
> something funky (I don't recall quite what it is/was), but the patch curbs that
> behaviour.
>
IIRC it allows you to specifiy which IMAP folder the message
Hey Haim,
Thursday, June 28, 2001, 4:42:46 PM, you wrote:
HD> Kevin,
>> If you apply Dave Fuchs' patch to make a '.' a valid character (but making '/'
>> and invalid one), then that becomes a valid Cyrus username. Search the Cyrus
>> IMAP mailing list archives for it. He sent it out for 2.0.
6 matches
Mail list logo
