Re: ingress shaping?

hi clement luca, thanks for your responses. i did include ingress shaping as a module, and it's automagically loaded when i try to use it. as luca said, the LARTC-howto states we can only 'shape data we transmit', but it was my believe that ingress shaping was there to solve this shortcoming

Re: ingress shaping?

hi clement luca, thanks for your responses. i did include ingress shaping as a module, and it's automagically loaded when i try to use it. as luca said, the LARTC-howto states we can only 'shape data we transmit', but it was my believe that ingress shaping was there to solve this shortcoming

ingress shaping?

hi everyone, thanx for the tips om my last traffic shaping question. i've managed to get a debian bridge (ebtables / bridge-nf patched 2.4.22 kernel w/ newest 'tc') up and running which does firewalling and outgoing shaping. now, i wanted to try the incoming ingress shaping, but i cant get

Re: ingress shaping?

R.M. Evers wrote: hi everyone, thanx for the tips om my last traffic shaping question. i've managed to get a debian bridge (ebtables / bridge-nf patched 2.4.22 kernel w/ newest 'tc') up and running which does firewalling and outgoing shaping. now, i wanted to try the incoming ingress shaping

ingress shaping?

hi everyone, thanx for the tips om my last traffic shaping question. i've managed to get a debian bridge (ebtables / bridge-nf patched 2.4.22 kernel w/ newest 'tc') up and running which does firewalling and outgoing shaping. now, i wanted to try the incoming ingress shaping, but i cant get

Re: ingress shaping?

R.M. Evers wrote: hi everyone, thanx for the tips om my last traffic shaping question. i've managed to get a debian bridge (ebtables / bridge-nf patched 2.4.22 kernel w/ newest 'tc') up and running which does firewalling and outgoing shaping. now, i wanted to try the incoming ingress shaping