ly 20, 2004 2:15
AM
Subject: Re: max requests a celeron web
server can handle
hi robert, all,
my problem is that i can't run a benchmark because i don't have that
machine. it's a managed hosting package im interested in.
the machine will be hosting 1 websit
Citát Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Too many variables. Apache comes with "ab" (apache benchmark) - you
> can use it to do real-world testing to answer the question.
I have another question - what is the optimal max. keep-alive time? Because as I
can see from Apache's /server-status page on
> I have another question - what is the optimal max. keep-alive time?
Because as I
> can see from Apache's /server-status page on our server, there are
usually about
> 10-15 processes in state "S" (Sending Reply) and another 40-50 in "K"
> (keepalive). In have lowered this time from 15 seconds to
Hello Shannon,
Monday, July 19, 2004, 11:22:23 AM, you wrote:
> Hello List!
>
>
> I've been googling around for recorded info on how many static
> files per second a 1.3GHz Pentium Celeron (1Gb RAM, 7200 RPM IDE
> hardisk), Apache web server can serve before it starts getting slow.
> The stat
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 11:38:24AM +0200, emilio brambilla wrote:
>hello,
>
>Volker Tanger wrote:
>>If you're looking for a high-performance webserver mainly for static
>>files, others than apache could be quite interesting for you,
>>especially thttpd, mathopd and Zeus - see
>> http://www.acm
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:15, "Shannon R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the machine will be hosting 1 website only. with about 3,000 static html
> files and about 5,000 image files (from 3kb to 100kb. and no, it's not a
> pornsite, but a bike enthusiast site)
>
> so what do you guys think? any ballpar
hello,
Volker Tanger wrote:
If you're looking for a high-performance webserver mainly for static
files, others than apache could be quite interesting for you,
especially thttpd, mathopd and Zeus - see
http://www.acme.com/software/thttpd/benchmarks.html
also note that apache 2.0 is much bett
Greetings!
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:24:12 +0200 Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 19 July 2004 19.22, Shannon R. wrote:
> > I've been googling around for recorded info on how many static files
> > per second a [...] Apache web server can serve before it sta
On Monday 19 July 2004 19.22, Shannon R. wrote:
> I've been googling around for recorded info on how many static files
> per second a [...] Apache web server can serve before it starts
> getting slow.
Hi,
In my experience, unless you have a *very* fast network connection,
apache should be able t
hi robert, all,
my problem is that i can't run a benchmark because i don't have that machine. it's a managed hosting package im interested in.
the machine will be hosting 1 website only. with about 3,000 static html files and about 5,000 image files (from 3kb to 100kb. and no, it's not a porn
Hi,
Depends on the files being served, are they always the same (one
website) or like 200 different websites? I guess with just static files
(no db &stuff) the IDE disk will be your bottleneck, unless the files
are mostly cached (you do have 1G RAM).
I would run an apache benchmark (ab) from mul
Hello List!
I've been googling around for recorded info on how many static files per second a 1.3GHz Pentium Celeron (1Gb RAM, 7200 RPM IDE hardisk), Apache web server can serve before it starts getting slow. The static files we're talking about here are just small files ranging from a few kilo
12 matches
Mail list logo
