- Original Message -
From: Ruth A. Kramer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling list
manager for qmail and Domain Tech. Control ?)
I'd like to try to help (to write an easy
Can someone write here an easy understandable configuration for
Postfix with virtual domains ? After some call for help here, none of
you that know Posfix did it...
there is an easy understandable VIRTUAL_README in postfix docs yet (at least
in woody version), so it's not necessary to
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:29:04PM +0100, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote:
4. the configuration is truly bizarre.bernstein has his own
non-standard
- Original Message -
From: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling list
manager for qmail and Domain Tech. Control ?)
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 08:36:08AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
On Thursday 19 February 2004 23.28, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote:
For example, I'd like comments on
[no cc:s necessary, thanks]
On Friday 20 February 2004 12.37, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 08:36:08AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
Bidder wrote:
I guess the document was written years ago, when postfix did indeed lack
*some* of the features people did expect (one of
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote:
I am in the process of choosing between postfix and qmail for our mail relays. I've
not decided yet. However, I am surprised by the fact that many people who prefer
postfix, also enjoy posting unqualified[0]
Bjørnar Bjørgum Larsen wrote:
I am in the process of choosing between postfix and qmail for our
mail relays. I've not decided yet. However, I am surprised by the
fact that many people who prefer postfix, also enjoy posting
unqualified[0] statements[1][2][3] about qmail.
If anyone have properly
I am in the process of choosing between postfix and qmail for our mail relays. I've
not decided yet. However, I am surprised by the fact that many people who prefer
postfix, also enjoy posting unqualified[0] statements[1][2][3] about qmail.
If anyone have properly grounded views, please share!
http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/Reviews/UnixMTSes/postfix.html
says at the very bottom:
Postfix is only available in source form,
not as precompiled or prepackaged binaries.
There is a list of FTP sites that hold the
source tarball on the official
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote:
[3] Craig Sanders wrote:
ps: qmail is a bad idea. postfix is better.
Your conclusion may be right, but the arguments are missing. Would you please
share?
search the archives of this list. MTA comparisons have been
On Thursday 19 February 2004 21.56, Dan MacNeil wrote:
http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/Reviews/UnixMTSes/postfix.ht
ml
says at the very bottom:
Postfix is only available in source form,
not as precompiled or prepackaged binaries.
There is a list of FTP sites
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote:
For example, I'd like comments on
http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/Reviews/UnixMTSes/postfix.html
a collection of lies, half-truths, and mistruths.
the best that can be said about this document is that the
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:22:54PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
I take this to mean that there are no binaries to download from postifx.org
itself - all binaries are made by integrators/vendors. This does not mean
that making binaries is not allowed.
Binaries are,
14 matches
Mail list logo
