Sorry i didn't send my anser to the maillist but i suggested to use proxyarp
with ip_forwarding and made a small example. ( i think its the fasted way to
solve this problem.
Greatings,
Robbert Helling
Citeren Tarragon Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 01:04 am, Mark Constable wr
> I have been allocated a x.x.x.144/28 (16 node) subnet
> .145 is the upstream gateway, .146/.147 is eth0/eth1 on box1
> there is a short xover cable between eth1 on box1 and box2
> .158 is eth0 on box2
>
> x.x.x.145 <-> eth0:x.x.x.146 eth1:x.x.x.147 <-xover-> eth0:x.x.x.158
On box1 (.146/.147) I
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 01:04 am, Mark Constable wrote:
> Not strictly Debian related but the boxes in question are deb powered.
> I have just been given a /28 (16 node) subnet and until I get a switch
> in place I have a short xover eth cable between two boxes. I thought I
> could get away with a coup
Hi Mark,
I'm not sure I understand your setup. Is the x.x.x.145 machine your
router or your ISP's? What do the routing tables look like for each
machine you control? From my experience, an upstream connection is
usually placed on a bridge network such as a /30. You may want to try
something li
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 01:48 am, you wrote:
> Proxy ARP on the .146/.147 box for .158?
I would have thought so too but all my attempts at arp'ing just
get errors like... (including a lot of attempted variations)..
# arp -i eth1 -s x.x.x.158 00:20:ED:47:B3:21 netmask 255.255.255.240
SIOCSARP: Invalid
Not strictly Debian related but the boxes in question are deb powered.
I have just been given a /28 (16 node) subnet and until I get a switch
in place I have a short xover eth cable between two boxes. I thought I
could get away with a couple of static routes in the mean time but the
upstream defaul
6 matches
Mail list logo
