No Idea, but I'm happy to accept suggestions / patches for javahelper to
do these things if it is helpful. Surely though you don't need to use
the path to these directly? The JRE/JDK should deal with that
What about apps like jcc (the app where I submitted and had accepted a
patch that use DE
On Mon Aug 18 20:14, peter green wrote:
> is there a correct way to get the name of the architecture for java, that
> is the ??? in /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/???/ files>. In the last package I fixed up that needed to know I used
> DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU and special cased powerpc but I can't
Hi,
Le Sunday 17 August 2008 17:42:18 Cyril Brulebois, vous avez écrit :
> - I assume libjline-java will pull the needed java machinery so you
>don't have to depend on a java runtime environment; is that correct?
As said by Matthew, sqlline is an application so it must depends on JRE.
I've a
is there a correct way to get the name of the architecture for java,
that is the ??? in /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/???/object files>. In the last package I fixed up that needed to know I used
DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU and special cased powerpc but I can't help feeling
that is a bit of a dirty
On Mon Aug 18 18:40, peter green wrote:
> are there any scripts in debian for locating a java runtime based on a set
> of criteria such as java versions supported and whether or not it is a
> sun/sun based runtime.
>
> or to put it another way what should packages that cannot run acceptablly
> w
are there any scripts in debian for locating a java runtime based on a
set of criteria such as java versions supported and whether or not it is
a sun/sun based runtime.
or to put it another way what should packages that cannot run
acceptablly with gcj be doing to ensure they run with a sun bas
[...]
>
> - build dependencies should be of the form openjdk-6-jdk |
>cacao-oj6-jdk, or else builds will fail on s390.
>
Shouldn't instead architecture specific build-depends be used?
Best,
Michael
pgpIi2Z9VR8GP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun Aug 17 17:42, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Damien Raude-Morvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/08/2008):
> > Cyril, did you have time to sponsor this package (if it's ok for you,
> > of course)?
>
> Here are some comments:
> - I assume libjline-java will pull the needed java machinery so you
>don'
Hello,
Needing a more recent version of fop for jeuclid package [1], I updated
the package and in the meantime closed a few bugs.
If I can do anything more to help on this, don't hesitate!
Thanks!
Sylvestre
[1] http://jeuclid.sourceforge.net/
Index: debian/control
Unfortunately there is a lot of packages with build dependencies on
openjdk-6-jdk directly, which is a bit unfortunate. Most likely all
packages build depending on openjdk-6-jdk should have RC bug reports
because they may contain 1.6 bytecode. The following should be checked
for the release:
- if
proposing a freeze exception for cacao-oj6 for testing. cacao-oj6 is a
copy of the openjdk-6 package with the cacao sources
included. Compared to openjdk-6 on architectures without the Hotspot
JIT support, cacao-oj6 (including a JIT) is a much faster JVM on the
architectures where it does build (po
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 19:25:52 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - build dependencies should be of the form openjdk-6-jdk |
>cacao-oj6-jdk, or else builds will fail on s390.
>
Why would that make a difference? Alternatives in build-deps aren't
considered by sbuild.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To U
Damien Raude-Morvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/08/2008):
> Cyril, did you have time to sponsor this package (if it's ok for you,
> of course)?
Here are some comments:
- I assume libjline-java will pull the needed java machinery so you
don't have to depend on a java runtime environment; is that co
13 matches
Mail list logo
