Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686
Version: 2.6.26-15
Severity: normal
Updating to lenny xorg stopped to work.
rienstalling it it changed is autodetection from vesa to openchrome drivers
(this coukd be acceptable, since these are specific for that chipset)
but on the other part it stopped working,
Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 2.6.29+19
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
The post-installation script for the 2.6.29 kernel fails,
leaving the package not cofigured.
Looks like both update-initramfs and mkinitrd.yaird are
called with wrong arguments (res
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 528176 important
Bug#528176: [linux-image-2.6-686] linux-image-2.6-686 fails to configure
(unable to create initrd image)
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:19:42AM +0200, Davide Alberani wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-686
> Version: 2.6.29+19
> Severity: serious
set to important, highly overblown as usual..
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> The post-installation script for the 2.6.29 kernel fails,
Hello,
I'm just bumping into a strange behaviour of kernel 2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 :
when doing a simple "vzctl stop ", it times out, and crashes with:
Stopping container ...
Unable to stop container: operation timed out
Container is currently running. Stop it first.
Hostname (FQDN) of the new VE :
On May 11, maximilian attems wrote:
> > Severity: serious
>
> set to important, highly overblown as usual..
Probably, but it prevents the usability of the kernel...
> post output of
> cat /etc/kernel-img.conf
Here it is:
# Kernel Image managem
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.29-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.29-4.dsc
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.29-4.tar.gz
aufs-modules-2.6.29-2-486_2.6.29+0+20090302-4_i386.deb
aufs-modules-2.6-486_2.6.29-4_i386.deb
batman-adv-modu
linux-modules-nonfree-2.6_2.6.29-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-nonfree-2.6_2.6.29-2.dsc
linux-modules-nonfree-2.6_2.6.29-2.tar.gz
fglrx-modules-2.6.29-2-486_2.6.29+9-4-2_i386.deb
fglrx-modules-2.6-486_2.6.29-2_i386.deb
fglrx-modules
aufs-modules-2.6-486_2.6.29-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/aufs-modules-2.6-486_2.6.29-4_i386.deb
aufs-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.29-4_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/aufs-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.29-4_i386.deb
aufs-modules-2.6-686_2.6.29-4_i386.deb
to po
fglrx-modules-2.6-486_2.6.29-2_i386.deb
to
pool/non-free/l/linux-modules-nonfree-2.6/fglrx-modules-2.6-486_2.6.29-2_i386.deb
fglrx-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.29-2_i386.deb
to
pool/non-free/l/linux-modules-nonfree-2.6/fglrx-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.29-2_i386.deb
fglrx-modules-2.6-686_2.6.29-
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:36:59PM +0200, Davide Alberani wrote:
> On May 11, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > > Severity: serious
> >
> > set to important, highly overblown as usual..
>
> Probably, but it prevents the usability of the kernel...
right the usability :)
it would be serious if it w
also sprach Tony Godshall [2009.05.11.1819 +0200]:
> > retitle 526525 amd64 kernel cannot find bnx2 PCI device base address
>
> Um. BNX2 is the network card? WTF does it have to do with being able
> to mount and boot off RAID in 64-bit mode only?
I don't know, but your attitude does not make m
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 12:35 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
> retitle 526525 amd64 kernel cannot find bnx2 PCI device base address
Um. BNX2 is the network card? WTF does it have to do with being able
to mount and boot off RAID in 64-bit mode only?
> also sprach Tony Godshall [2009.05.09.0117 +020
also sprach Tony Godshall [2009.05.11.1843 +0200]:
> I filed the report because I want to see Debian work great on all
> configurations, with all CPUs, with all RAID configurations, off the
> bat, without tweaking. And I'm trying to do what small part I can.
> With the limited access to the equip
Did I say I was looking for help?
As I said before, I am fine running with a 32 bit kernel.
I filed the report because I want to see Debian work great on all
configurations, with all CPUs, with all RAID configurations, off the
bat, without tweaking. And I'm trying to do what small part I can.
Wi
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:55 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Tony Godshall [2009.05.11.1843 +0200]:
>> I filed the report because I want to see Debian work great on all
>> configurations, with all CPUs, with all RAID configurations, off the
>> bat, without tweaking. And I'm trying to do
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.18-6-all_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6.18-6-all-powerpc_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6.18-6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2_
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.18-6-all_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6.18-6-all-powerpc_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6.18-6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2_powerpc.deb
On May 11, maximilian attems wrote:
> it would be serious if it wouldn't be installable
> on X boxes where X is a nr >> 1000
Ah-ah! Time for me to read the documentation. Or to buy
more hardware... ;-)
> > > cat /etc/kernel-img.conf
[...]
> grr looks good, so no idea on a quick look.
/var/
...
> Sorry. We got off on a bad start. I'll review your stuff tomorrow
> and then let's start afresh.
OK
> By the time you get dumped into the busybox prompt during initramfs
> time, are /dev/sd[abcd] present?
They are *not*. That would seem to be the nub of the problem. No
base partitions, t
Package: cman
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
upstream has 3.0.0rc2 available. Would be great to have this in unstable
for testing.
Cheers,
-- Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2009 21:50:07 +0200
with message-id <87r5yvl8r4@gismo.pca.it>
and subject line Re: Bug#514292: linux-image-2.6.28-1-amd64: Bad page state in
process 'emacs'
has caused the Debian Bug report #514292,
regarding linux-image-2.6.28-1-amd64: Bad page state in process
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 528268 linux-2.6
Bug#528268: linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64: sensor driver error
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
P
Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.29-3
Followup-For: Bug #503766
With 2.6.29 the display is turned off when the intelfb module is loaded.
Unable to frob numlock led on keyboard, no ping.
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.29-1-amd64 (Debian 2.6.29-3) (m...@de
Accepted:
linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8etch1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.24/linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8etch1.diff.gz
linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8etch1.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6.24/linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8etch1.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.8etch1_all.d
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch1.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch1.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch1_all.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-do
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2_all.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-do
Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2009 23:29:57 +0200
with message-id <20090511212957.ga31...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp: various modules cannot be
loaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #435134,
regarding linux-image-2.6.22-1-alpha-smp: various module
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 06:47:13PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On 2009-05-07, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 02:25:25PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> >>
> >> > i would have been happier to push the soon to come 2.6.30 for lenny+half,
> >> > but that looks impossible d
29 matches
Mail list logo
