On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 21:49:42 -0400 Dan Weber wrote:
> The new upstream (Herbert) is placing this in the LICENSE file as of
> the next release which will clarify for other distributions and
> packagers.
This is great news, indeed.
Obviously, the new upstream must make sure that each copyright hol
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 11:07:14AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> >Hardware is not part of Debian, and the fact that Debian depends on
>> >non-free pieces of hardware has never been considered to violate any of
>> >the above. (And, as I've said a few times, stuff tucked a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 05:50:29PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> So, following from this why you think that the motherboard firmware
>> (the BIOS, which can be reflashed by users) or the CD reader firmware
>> (which can be reflashed as well, with the right tools) and e.g.
Note: lists.debian.org is refusing to allow me to subscribe: please
forward this post.
MJ Ray scripsit:
> Sublicensing means that you are still bound by the original licence,
> but you can offer any licence in the specified range to those you
> distribute to.
Quite so, and I should have clari
"Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 11:07:14AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>>> >Hardware is not part of Debian, and the fact that Debian depends on
>>> >non-free pieces of hardware has never been considered to violate any of
>>> >the abo
5 matches
Mail list logo
