"John Halton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Michael Below <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Do 21 Feb 2008 10:25:01 CET
schrieb "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> IMHO the patches sent to a upstream author which
> does
NB: If you can keep attribution intact in the future, that would help
a lot.
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Willi Mann wrote:
> >> The most important one is that not having all of the copyright
> >> holders represented means that we don't actually know what terms
> >> we are able to distribute the final wor
"Cameron Dale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Can I release the entire program under the GPL?
>
> 2) Do I NEED to make reference to the other works? Should I?
>
> 3) Can I remove the headers in the files that I have modified that
> state the original authors and licenses of the files?
I also reco
Please preserve attribution lines for material that you quote, so we
can see who wrote what at each level.
Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The default suggestion would be for you (or people you can trust
> > to do the work) to contact those further upstream who could tell
> > you about
>> The most important one is that not having all of the copyright holders
>> represented means that we don't actually know what terms we are able
>> to distribute the final work. A component of a work which is
>> unlicenced makes the entire work undistributable.
I don't understand why this is sol
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Michael Below <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Do 21 Feb 2008 10:25:01 CET
> schrieb "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > IMHO the patches sent to a upstream author which
> > doesn't patch the original copyright (adding a name or
> > a copyright l
Am Do 21 Feb 2008 10:25:01 CET
schrieb "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> IMHO the patches sent to a upstream author which
> doesn't patch the original copyright (adding a name or
> a copyright line) should be interpreted as the above case.
> IMHO the author implicit acknowledges that t
Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Willi Mann wrote:
Can you explain to me what the consequences of an imcomplete list of
copyright holders would be? It should make it easier for me to argue
upstream.
The most important one is that not having all of the copyright holders
represented mea
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Willi Mann wrote:
> Can you explain to me what the consequences of an imcomplete list of
> copyright holders would be? It should make it easier for me to argue
> upstream.
The most important one is that not having all of the copyright holders
represented means that we don't ac
9 matches
Mail list logo
