2007/5/15, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
How about:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0/legalcode with 4. d.
added saying:
You may not publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally
perform the Work except as part of the game and you may not
d
2007/4/27, Jason Spiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/4/27, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] How about using:
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0/legalcode with 4. d.
> added saying:
>
> You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or
> publicl
On Tue May 15 17:25, Jason A. Spiro wrote:
> But one question:
>
> Do those license terms allow the songs to be distributed in a separate
> Debian package from the primary "fretsonfire" package?
No, it will have to be amended to allow this as was suggested elsewhere
in this thread.
> What if t
2007/4/27, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu Apr 26 21:16, Jason Spiro wrote:
> I don't know much about how to write licenses, and this is the first
> one I have ever written. I figured that everything after the "subject
> to the following conditions:" would automatically overri
On Thu Apr 26 21:16, Jason Spiro wrote:
> I don't know much about how to write licenses, and this is the first
> one I have ever written. I figured that everything after the "subject
> to the following conditions:" would automatically override the initial
> permissions I gave. I guess I was wro
El jueves, 26 de abril de 2007 a las 16:25:40 -0400, Jason Spiro escribía:
I have dropped Tommi, Sami and Joonas from the Cc because I don't think
they want to be bothered too much with this kind of things, and only care
about the results. Feel free to correct me if that isn't the case.
> * Pers
Hi Matthew,
2007/4/26, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu Apr 26 16:25, Jason Spiro wrote:
> Copyright (C)
>
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining
> a copy of this work (the "Work") to use, modify, copy, publish,
> distribute, publicly perform,
On Thu Apr 26 16:25, Jason Spiro wrote:
> Copyright (C)
>
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining
> a copy of this work (the "Work") to use, modify, copy, publish,
> distribute, publicly perform, and/or sublicense copies of the Work,
> and/or to charge a fee for t
2007/3/28, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue Mar 27 20:54, Jason Spiro wrote:
> 2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> >> Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a
> >> license before, but maybe I
Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> Apparently, if you *haven't* signed with any collecting agencies, these
> folks automatically get the right to collect royalties "for" you.
> [...] it stinks to high heaven -- it's one of the political
> doublespeak moves where you create an organiza
Jason Spiro wrote:
> 2007/3/28, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 3/28/07, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Yes that's the contract you have to sign to be part of Teosto (which
>> you
>> > have
>> > to do if you ever want to make a living in Finland as a musician).
Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes that's the contract you have to sign to be part of Teosto (which you have
> to do if you ever want to make a living in Finland as a musician).
Please, ask Finland's *legislators* if the situation there is really
that anti-competitive closed shop. I
2007/3/28, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/28/07, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes that's the contract you have to sign to be part of Teosto (which you
> have
> to do if you ever want to make a living in Finland as a musician).
Ouch. As was indicated earlier this
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew
Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On 3/28/07, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes that's the contract you have to sign to be part of Teosto (which you
have
to do if you ever want to make a living in Finland as a musician).
Ouch. As was indi
On 3/28/07, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes that's the contract you have to sign to be part of Teosto (which you
have
to do if you ever want to make a living in Finland as a musician).
Ouch. As was indicated earlier this seems standard for all performance
rights organisations.
-
On 3/28/07, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/28/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, it actually seems rather strange to me for an organization which
> > is designed to "protect" artists disallowing artists from determining
> > how their own works are licensed, s
* Don Armstrong:
> Well, it actually seems rather strange to me for an organization which
> is designed to "protect" artists disallowing artists from determining
> how their own works are licensed,
This is common practice for organizations that collect royalties on
behalf of composers. If you wa
On Tue Mar 27 20:54, Jason Spiro wrote:
> 2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> >> Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a
> >> license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could
> >> get Teosto to agr
On 3/28/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, it actually seems rather strange to me for an organization which
is designed to "protect" artists disallowing artists from determining
how their own works are licensed, so I'm trying to give them the
benifit of the doubt here.
Do they r
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> 2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> >> Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a
> >> license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could
> >> get Teosto to agr
2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a
> license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could
> get Teosto to agree on more liberal terms than we would get if
> Teos
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a
> license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could
> get Teosto to agree on more liberal terms than we would get if
> Teosto wrote one?
The following is what I would use
Hi all, hi Don; thanks for your input.
2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[parts snipped]
There's really no point to drafting such a license, because it would
not be acceptable for main, and more to the point, Teosto would have
to vet it. Teosto's lawyers should really be the o
First off, thanks to all involved for working through this; legal
stuff is annoying, but getting it right early makes it all worthwhile
in the end.
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> We have a question about the default songs for the guitar-simulation
> game Frets On Fire. (We would like t
We have a question about the default songs for the guitar-simulation
game Frets On Fire. (We would like to get the songs into main if
possible; otherwise, into contrib or non-free. But we need to satisfy
the Finnish music licensing organization Teosto. The full original
thread is at http://bugs
25 matches
Mail list logo
