On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 07:21:34PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Hi,
> rather than commenting on the several misconceptions and plain false
> statements included in the upstream author's answer, I will just
> recommend you to reply him something similar to the following:
That's an excellent
On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 13:25:17 +0100 Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
[...]
> I have ask the upstream author Paul E. Jones .
> Here are the answer:
[...]
Hi,
rather than commenting on the several misconceptions and plain false
statements included in the upstream author's answer, I
Hello,
first thanks for your answers.
The files we talk about are utils/sha1.cc and utils/sha1.h from[1].
I have ask the upstream author Paul E. Jones .
Here are the answer:
[quote]
Jörg,
Sad that one would read into this more than is written. Because it
doesn't say
Charles Plessy writes:
> Le Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 11:21:37AM +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
> > Ian Jackson writes:
> >
> > > I'm afraid you'll have to go back to the authors/copyrightholders
> > > and get them to fix the licence for this
Le Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 11:21:37AM +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
> > I'm afraid you'll have to go back to the authors/copyrightholders and
> > get them to fix the licence for this particular program.
>
> Preferably, convince the copyright
Ian Jackson writes:
> I'm afraid you'll have to go back to the authors/copyrightholders and
> get them to fix the licence for this particular program.
Preferably, convince the copyright holders that the reliable option is
an existing, well-understood, known
Jörg Frings-Fürst writes ("Freeware Public License (FPL)"):
> a short question: is this license DFSG compatible?
Sadly there isn't permission to modify. I think this is probably
unintentional.
I'm afraid you'll have to go back to the authors/copyrightholders and
get them to fi
2016-10-29 18:11 GMT-02:00 Ben Finney :
>
> Because no other DFSG freedoms are granted, those remain reserved to the
> copyright holders.
>
> So a work under this license would be non-free.
I agree. I can't see rights for modify the source code. This and other
rights must be
Jörg Frings-Fürst <deb...@jff-webhosting.net> writes:
> a short question: is this license DFSG compatible?
The DFSG does not apply to licen texts in isolation. It applies to works
for distribution in Debian. A particular license is only one aspect of
the work to consider.
> Fre
Hello,
a short question: is this license DFSG compatible?
Many thanks
CU
Jörg
[quote]
Copyright (C) 1998, 2009
Paul E. Jones <pau...@packetizer.com>
Freeware Public License (FPL)
This software is licensed as "freeware." Permission to distribute
this software in source
10 matches
Mail list logo