On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
What do you think?
Um, I think I said the same thing, down to the reference to the GPLV3
clause meant to prevent the problem?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
"Marcelo E. Magallon" writes:
> My interpretation of the whole thing is that in order to comply with
> the terms of the GPLv2, we should put yet another file, README.GPLv2,
> in the .iso explaining how to obtain the sources and accompany that
> with the offer to provide source for three years
"Marcelo E. Magallon" wrote:
> Now, back to the Debian case, Bradley seems to think that
> providing a method to download the source (e.g. apt-get source)
> is not enough. If I understand it correctly, he's saying we
> must do something extra to comply with GPLv2ยง3: a) provide the
> source *
Hi everyone,
the request to stop redistributing Debian in Germany sparked an
interesting conversation in identi.ca:
http://identi.ca/conversation/69498913
In that conversation Bradley Kuhn said:
bkuhn @vinzv, Please note: *technically speaking*, !Debian
project itself violates !GPlv
4 matches
Mail list logo
