Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1014421 [lintian] false \' alert in '\\'
Bug #966803 [lintian] acute-accent-in-manual-page: false positive '\\'
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1014421: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014421
966803: https://bug
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #966803 [lintian] acute-accent-in-manual-page: false positive '\\'
Bug #1014421 [lintian] false \' alert in '\\'
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #966803 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1014421 to the sam
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # It's a severity, no tag. :-)
> severity 743694 wishlist
Bug #743694 [lintian] Downgrade most of privacy-breach* tags from severity:
error to pedantic
Bug #765503 [lintian] lintian: privacy-breach should be a warning, not an error
Severity set t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 966803 1014421
Bug #966803 [lintian] acute-accent-in-manual-page: false positive '\\'
Bug #1014421 [lintian] false \' alert in '\\'
Marked as found in versions lintian/2.85.0 and lintian/2.88.0.
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Bug #966803 [lint
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 wishlist
Unknown tag/s: wishlist.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream
pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed
fixed-in-experimental sid experimental potato woody sarge sarge-ignore
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 wishlist
Unknown tag/s: wishlist.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream
pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed
fixed-in-experimental sid experimental potato woody sarge sarge-ignore
Control: tag -1 wishlist
Control: tag -1 + wontfix
Hi,
Paul Wise wrote on 11. Sep. 2021:
> I think that the privacy breaches that lintian complains about
> represent several sets of bugs that all need fixing:
I strongly agree with pabs and his (no more copied) explanations and
reasoning. These a
Hi Peter,
Peter B wrote:
> > The suffix "icns" is already in the blacklist since 2.115.2. With
> > which version of Lintian did you generate that list?
>
> I use Testing, so it was 2.115.1 It is indeed fixed in 2.115.2
Yay! Thanks for the reply. :-)
> Trying on duma, I got several hits on bina
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 993613 1014254
Bug #993613 [lintian] lintian: Complex regular subexpression recursion limit
exceeded in cruft check
Bug #996837 [lintian] lintian displays errors when checking webpack 5.58
Bug #993613 [lintian] lintian: Complex regular
Axel Beckert pushed to branch master at lintian / lintian
Commits:
39452842 by Pino Toscano at 2022-07-06T21:18:19+02:00
Add extensions of colour profiles: icc, icm
- - - - -
a1addb26 by Pino Toscano at 2022-07-06T21:50:34+02:00
Add more extensions of document files
- various OpenDocument for
Hi,
This still affects v2.115.2.
$ lintian r-cran-swagger_3.33.1-1.dsc
Warning in processable r-cran-swagger_3.33.1-1.dsc: Complex regular
subexpression recursion limit (65534) exceeded at
/usr/share/lintian/lib/Lintian/Check/Cruft.pm line 449.
Warning in processable r-cran-swagger_3.33.1-1.dsc
11 matches
Mail list logo