El 09/11/15 a las 10:59, Santiago Ruano Rincón escribió:
> El 09/11/15 a las 09:44, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> > On Fri, 06 Nov 2015, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > There were some questions about dropping the mysql-common package, so
> > > mysql-*-5.5 would depend on the 5.1
Hi,
El 27/11/15 a las 23:49, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
...
> Anyway I don't have any strong objection to use DLA numbers for those
> updates as well. I was just expressing my unease with that usage.
>
Any other opinions?
Please, take a look to the attached template that I'll use to contact the
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > And there are bots handling DLA to auto-publish news about possible
> > security issues... for example on lwn.net. And I don't think this is
> > appropriate.
>
> It seems that lwn.net can handle this: https://lwn.net/Articles/595312/
Well, sur
El 27/11/15 a las 14:43, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > why not? DLA means "Debian LTS Announcement" and I think it's worthwhile to
> > document all changes somewhere, exactly because it's oldoldstable, so
> > normally
> > doesn't change. So announcing
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Holger Levsen wrote:
> why not? DLA means "Debian LTS Announcement" and I think it's worthwhile to
> document all changes somewhere, exactly because it's oldoldstable, so
> normally
> doesn't change. So announcing this via a DLA seems entirely approbriate to me.
Just to be
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 26. November 2015, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> But I would suggest to not release any "DLA" but just a simple mail
> announcing why those packages are updated...
why not? DLA means "Debian LTS Announcement" and I think it's worthwhile to
document all changes somewhere, exactly be
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> According to [1], there are six packages that have issues with mysql-5.5
> and dbconfig-common. To being able to propose mysql-5.5 we need to
> update those packages first, modifying the problematic syntax. If those
> changes are compatible w
Hi,
According to [1], there are six packages that have issues with mysql-5.5
and dbconfig-common. To being able to propose mysql-5.5 we need to
update those packages first, modifying the problematic syntax. If those
changes are compatible with mysql 5.1 and 5.5, is it OK to upload the
packages to
El 09/11/15 a las 09:44, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2015, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There were some questions about dropping the mysql-common package, so
> > mysql-*-5.5 would depend on the 5.1 version. Then, I build a new package
> > with
> > the corresponding
On Fri, 06 Nov 2015, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There were some questions about dropping the mysql-common package, so
> mysql-*-5.5 would depend on the 5.1 version. Then, I build a new package with
> the corresponding changes, and I have got a minor error:
>
> [Note] /usr/sbin/mysqld
(There are more than one mysql-5.5 related threads. To avoid messing
things up, I suggest to continue here)
El 02/11/15 a las 11:12, Santiago Ruano Rincón escribió:
> Hi Raphaël,
>
> El 30/10/15 a las 17:11, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have been testing the mysql-5.5 package p
Hi Raphaël,
El 30/10/15 a las 17:11, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> Hello,
>
> I have been testing the mysql-5.5 package prepared by Santiago in his
> repository:
>
> deb https://people.debian.org/~santiago/debian santiago-squeeze-lts/
> deb-src https://people.debian.org/~santiago/debian santia
Hi all,
I am not really going to do any of this work for mysql-5.5, but...
On 30-10-15 17:11, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> And this gives more ideas of things to verify: test install all packages
> depending on dbconfig-common and offering mysql support.
If there are any questions related to what db
Hello,
I have been testing the mysql-5.5 package prepared by Santiago in his
repository:
deb https://people.debian.org/~santiago/debian santiago-squeeze-lts/
deb-src https://people.debian.org/~santiago/debian santiago-squeeze-lts/
Here are the first problems I discovered:
* phpmyadmin woul
14 matches
Mail list logo