On 2011/8/23 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>>> I am fairly confident with the sqlite patch. I am a lot less confident
>>> with the ftgl patch. For some reason FTLibrary.h
Hi Vanessa,
thanks for your effort.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 01:14:19AM -0300, Vanessa Gutiérrez wrote:
> I'm happy to finally say that I finished the script that will
> automatically post
> to DebianMed' s twitter and identi.ca account all the new posts from the
> blog.
Did you checked whether
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 07:18:57AM +0100, Peter Cock wrote:
> > Seems to be a reasonable compromise specifically because you
> > can be qute sure to fetch up to date files.
>
> Agreed. Of course one of the downsides is you might want to
> also test old data (the formatting of data files from publi
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:18:04AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > What are the differences between the VTK version of these
> > libraries and their respective upstream version?
>
> VTK ships a convenient FTGL 1.32 version (April 23 2002), while debian
> archive contains 2.1.3 since 2008-05-03
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:03:44PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> This should be *very* visible in the post itself. We generally require
> Team Blogs, like this is, to prominently state who made it. Good
> examples are the DebConf and the Debian Sysadmin blog, where its
> basically
>
> "Blog title"
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 02:21:33AM +0100, Peter Cock wrote:
>> I have had an initial reply that the licensing issue will be raised
>> at the next UniProt consortium meeting, but in the meantime
>> they recommend downloading test files via the
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
>> I am fairly confident with the sqlite patch. I am a lot less confident
>> with the ftgl patch. For some reason FTLibrary.h is not installed in
>> ftgl installation but
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 02:21:33AM +0100, Peter Cock wrote:
> I have had an initial reply that the licensing issue will be raised
> at the next UniProt consortium meeting, but in the meantime
> they recommend downloading test files via the UniProt API
> as part of a test suite, rather than bundling
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have now emailed UniProt regarding the recent discussion on the
> Debian-Med list about the UniProt CC BY-ND 3.0 licence stemming
> from the inclusion of example data from UniProt in EMBOSS (and
> potentially other open source to
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I am fairly confident with the sqlite patch. I am a lot less confident
> with the ftgl patch. For some reason FTLibrary.h is not installed in
> ftgl installation but seems to be used by VTK internals.
What are the differences be
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Michael Schutte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:46:00PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> IMHO it is quite straightforeward to verify sqlite whether there are
>> some changes. I would think handling this apropriately and overriding
>> the ftgl library wit
On 12580 March 1977, Michael Banck wrote:
>> On 08/22/2011 05:15 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
>> > the latest debian-med blog post (syndicated on Planet Debian, CC'd)
>> > http://debianmed.blogspot.com/2011/08/experimenting-with-amazon-cloud-and.html>
>> > > has raised some eyebrows.
>> > First of
2011/8/22 Andreas Tille :
>
> Do the git-buildpackage users have any idea what to do?
dh_clean removes src/mod_camera/a la espera/mod_camera.pjd.bak file at
the beginning of the build process, so git thinks it is an uncommited
change. The error comes from an unclean orig.tar.gz from upstream.
I'll
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:46:00PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> IMHO it is quite straightforeward to verify sqlite whether there are
> some changes. I would think handling this apropriately and overriding
> the ftgl library with the (not so good) reason to push foreward this
> package to be
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:22:54PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:16:59PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
>> > I just uploaded vtk to DELAYED/0.
>>
>> For the record, the updated package was rejected due to #638883.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:22:54PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:16:59PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
> > I just uploaded vtk to DELAYED/0.
>
> For the record, the updated package was rejected due to #638883.
Uhmmm. :-(
IMHO it is quite straightforeward to verify sq
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:32:05PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
> > I’ll take care of this tomorrow. ITK is a team effort anyway. VTK
> > maintainers: now it’s time to complain (or upload yourself) :-)
>
> Done!
Cool!
Thanks, Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:16:59PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
> I just uploaded vtk to DELAYED/0.
For the record, the updated package was rejected due to #638883.
All the best,
--
Michael Schutte | michi@{uiae.at,debian.org}
Innsbruck, Austria| happily accept
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
> I’ll take care of this tomorrow. ITK is a team effort anyway. VTK
> maintainers: now it’s time to complain (or upload yourself) :-)
Done!
Cheers,
--
Michael Schutte | michi@{uiae.at,debian.org}
Innsbruck, Aust
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 05:34:28PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> On 08/22/2011 05:15 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> > the latest debian-med blog post (syndicated on Planet Debian, CC'd)
> > http://debianmed.blogspot.com/2011/08/experimenting-with-amazon-cloud-and.html
> > has raised some eyebrow
Hi!
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Steffen Möller wrote:
> For the future, is there a way to have some bits not forwarded?
> Or to have them only selectively forwarded? Well, the mailing
> list, probably.
You can tag the posts and have a RSS (for that specific tag) that will
be published in P
Hello,
On 08/22/2011 05:15 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> the latest debian-med blog post (syndicated on Planet Debian, CC'd)
> http://debianmed.blogspot.com/2011/08/experimenting-with-amazon-cloud-and.html
> has raised some eyebrows.
>
> First off, it should be somehow stated which person wrote/po
Hi,
the latest debian-med blog post (syndicated on Planet Debian, CC'd)
http://debianmed.blogspot.com/2011/08/experimenting-with-amazon-cloud-and.html
has raised some eyebrows.
First off, it should be somehow stated which person wrote/posted the
particular post for team-based blogs. This blog
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:53:37PM +0200, Luis Rivas wrote:
> > 1. At first I would recommend to reflect group maintenance via
>
> Done!
Fine.
> I've uploaded my code to git.debian.org/git/debian-med/sitplus.git and
> updated the Vcs field as you told me. I've followed [2], I hope I
> didn't ma
2011/8/17 Andreas Tille :
> [Luis, I'll drop the CC in case you confirm that you are reading this list]
>
> Hi Luis,
>
> thanks for your work on sitplus.
Hi, Andreas. Thanks for reviewing my package. I've uploaded a new
version, 1.0.1-2, to [1].
> Here are my comments.
>
> 1. At first I would rec
- Mail original -
> De: "Steffen Möller"
> À: "Debian Med Project List"
> Envoyé: Lundi 22 Août 2011 09:10:47
> Objet: BioMAJ and getData
> Dear all,
>
> with BioMAJ [1] and getData [2], our distro has now two tools in the
> distribution that address the retrieval and post-processing
>
Dear all,
with BioMAJ [1] and getData [2], our distro has now two tools in the
distribution that address the retrieval and post-processing
of public (or not so public) databases. Hilmar from the OBF has just pointed me
to an again very different approach towards the
same by the Open Knowledge Fo
27 matches
Mail list logo
