Hi Michael,
> Sascha, care to share your reproducibility test setup?
Sure, but it’s nothing too flashy and basically just the recommended reference
setup. With cowbuilder installed and my pbuilderrc
(https://github.com/satta/dotfiles/blob/master/pbuilder/.pbuilderrc) just
follow the instructio
Sascha, care to share your reproducibility test setup?
Joi, 25 feb. 2016, 19:51, Sascha Steinbiss a scris:
> Hey,
>
> > [...]
> >> and builds reproducibly.
> >
> > Actually, I just noticed it doesn't! I do get slightly different
> > binaries (though no timestamps involved) and I can't track it d
Hello,
على الخميس 25 شباط 2016 10:34، كتب Sascha Steinbiss:
> Hey,
>
>> [...]
>>> and builds reproducibly.
>>
>> Actually, I just noticed it doesn't! I do get slightly different
>> binaries (though no timestamps involved) and I can't track it down
>> further for now.
>
> OK, it was just a ccac
Hey,
> [...]
>> and builds reproducibly.
>
> Actually, I just noticed it doesn't! I do get slightly different
> binaries (though no timestamps involved) and I can't track it down
> further for now.
OK, it was just a ccache issue in my reproducibility testing setup. The package
is fine!
Cheers
Hi again,
[...]
> and builds reproducibly.
Actually, I just noticed it doesn't! I do get slightly different
binaries (though no timestamps involved) and I can't track it down
further for now. I'll try to get in touch with the r-b team later.
However, I don't consider this an upload blocker at the
Hi all,
with all required dependencies in place now and with a proper test case
I think REAPR is ready for upload. Code is in git, could anyone take a
look please?
The package has no lintian errors/warnings, has build time tests as well
as autopkgtests, and builds reproducibly.
Many thanks,
Sasch
6 matches
Mail list logo