cvs-- can't remember initial vendor tag

2001-04-02 Thread Chris Ruffin
How can I extract the vendor tag information from a CVS module? I'm trying to import new upstream sources but I can't remember the initial vendor tag that I used to import previous versions! -- Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpW53pCDhFar.pgp Description: PGP signature

cvs-- can't remember initial vendor tag

2001-04-02 Thread Chris Ruffin
How can I extract the vendor tag information from a CVS module? I'm trying to import new upstream sources but I can't remember the initial vendor tag that I used to import previous versions! -- Chris Ruffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP signature

RE: Build-Depends

2001-04-02 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 02-Apr-2001 Carlos Laviola wrote: > Hi, > > I am packaging zclock, a clock applet for GNOME, and it depends on a lot of > gnome libs and headers to compile. While I was able to determine a few of the > -dev packages I must declare as build-dependencies, I am sure that I'm > missing > some. Wha

Re: Build-Depends

2001-04-02 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 04:46:55PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote: > What do you do to ensure that your packages aren't missing build-depends? build it in a clean chroot, after getting all the files in build-essential and those listed in build-depends. if your compile fails, add the missing package

Build-Depends

2001-04-02 Thread Carlos Laviola
Hi, I am packaging zclock, a clock applet for GNOME, and it depends on a lot of gnome libs and headers to compile. While I was able to determine a few of the -dev packages I must declare as build-dependencies, I am sure that I'm missing some. What do you do to ensure that your packages aren't miss

RE: Build-Depends

2001-04-02 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 02-Apr-2001 Carlos Laviola wrote: > Hi, > > I am packaging zclock, a clock applet for GNOME, and it depends on a lot of > gnome libs and headers to compile. While I was able to determine a few of the > -dev packages I must declare as build-dependencies, I am sure that I'm > missing > some. Wh

Re: Build-Depends

2001-04-02 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 04:46:55PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote: > What do you do to ensure that your packages aren't missing build-depends? build it in a clean chroot, after getting all the files in build-essential and those listed in build-depends. if your compile fails, add the missing packag

Build-Depends

2001-04-02 Thread Carlos Laviola
Hi, I am packaging zclock, a clock applet for GNOME, and it depends on a lot of gnome libs and headers to compile. While I was able to determine a few of the -dev packages I must declare as build-dependencies, I am sure that I'm missing some. What do you do to ensure that your packages aren't mis

strange apt-get problem

2001-04-02 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
I've made potato versions of my webmin packages available at an aptable archive. One of those, webmin-ssl has a depends line like this: Depends: perl, debconf,libnet-ssleay-perl,libauthen-pam-perl I'm getting reports when people do an apt-get install webmin-ssl, they get the following error mess

Re: upstream new version

2001-04-02 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Michael Piefel wrote: > > Or debian-changelog-mode in emacs (from the dpkg-dev-el package) > > Or, of course, the debian-changelog mode for vim, which will be part of > Vim 6.0 (it's already in the beta versions). I smell a feature competition coming on... (just joking :-)

strange apt-get problem

2001-04-02 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
I've made potato versions of my webmin packages available at an aptable archive. One of those, webmin-ssl has a depends line like this: Depends: perl, debconf,libnet-ssleay-perl,libauthen-pam-perl I'm getting reports when people do an apt-get install webmin-ssl, they get the following error mes

Re: upstream new version

2001-04-02 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Michael Piefel wrote: > > Or debian-changelog-mode in emacs (from the dpkg-dev-el package) > > Or, of course, the debian-changelog mode for vim, which will be part of > Vim 6.0 (it's already in the beta versions). I smell a feature competition coming on... (just joking :-) -- To UNSUBSC

Re: upstream new version

2001-04-02 Thread Michael Piefel
Am 30.03.01 um 02:08:47 schrieb Timshel Knoll: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:18:26AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > >-> copy the debian/changelog file and add a new entry there. (is there > > > a > > >tool for doing this, or do i need to do it by hand like i currently do > > > ?) > > debch

Re: upstream new version

2001-04-02 Thread Michael Piefel
Am 30.03.01 um 02:08:47 schrieb Timshel Knoll: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:18:26AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > >-> copy the debian/changelog file and add a new entry there. (is there a > > >tool for doing this, or do i need to do it by hand like i currently do ?) > > debchange (in the

Re: ldd, dpkg-shlibdeps and libsocks.so

2001-04-02 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Ben Collins | It is a bug in libsocks4, which should compile the library with -soname | libsocks.so.4. I'm willing to bet that libsocks.so is created by | ldconfig when libsocks4 is installed, else it wouldn't even work without | the -dev package installed. So reassigning the bug against libso