On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Balázs Hámorszky wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.4.2-1.1
> of my package "ming".
Did you try to contact the maintainer before preparing this NMU?
You didn't document any of the debian/ changes in the debian/changelog file.
--
bye,
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.4.2-1.1
of my package "ming".
It builds these binary packages:
libming-dev - Library to generate SWF (Flash) Files (development files)
libming-util - Library to generate SWF (Flash) Files - Utilities
libming1 - Library to generate
Dear mentors,
I am still seeking a sponsor for backintime, but in the meantime I have
also updated to the new upstream version. You can find the new dsc at
[1], all the other details are as in my original mail.
Thanks in advance.
[1]
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/backintime/backi
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 05:42:52PM -0500, Albert Lash wrote:
> I've just uploaded the latest version (0.2.4) of php-nexista, a sponsor
> would be great! Any feedback would be appreciated as well.
IANADD and can't upload for you, but I can give you some feedback to get
it into shape for a sponsor.
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 05:42:52PM -0500, Albert Lash wrote:
> I've just uploaded the latest version (0.2.4) of php-nexista, a sponsor
> would be great! Any feedback would be appreciated as well.
How about a link to the dsc?
> This packaging was done with dh-make-php, which is a terrific tool. I
Hello,
I've just uploaded the latest version (0.2.4) of php-nexista, a sponsor
would be great! Any feedback would be appreciated as well.
This packaging was done with dh-make-php, which is a terrific tool. I
originally made a pear package, so making a debian package was a piece of
cake.
Thanks i
Christoph Egger (21/12/2008):
> Jup I know the procedure, I was more in trouble wether it is
> reasonable. There is no need I guess to have this done for lenny.
You can propose/ask for opinion on debian...@.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi!
Thanks for your reply.
Neil Williams schrieb:
> On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:59:33 +0100
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>
>> As I have never requested removal of an package I'm asking here for
>> some opinions to make sure my thoughts are reasonable. Any comments
>> are welcome!
>>
>> Some Data:
>>
As I have never requested removal of an package I'm asking here for
some opinions to make sure my thoughts are reasonable. Any comments are
welcome!
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Some Data:
* Popcon inst: 359
* Open Bugs: 6 <=3D normal
* Last upstream release: May 2005
* priority: optional
* Section: de
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:59:33 +0100
Christoph Egger wrote:
> As I have never requested removal of an package I'm asking here for
> some opinions to make sure my thoughts are reasonable. Any comments
> are welcome!
>
> Some Data:
>
> * Popcon inst: 359
> * Open Bugs: 6 <= normal
> * Last ups
As I have never requested removal of an package I'm asking here for
some opinions to make sure my thoughts are reasonable. Any comments are
welcome!
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Some Data:
* Popcon inst: 359
* Open Bugs: 6 <=3D normal
* Last upstream release: May 2005
* priority: optional
* Section: de
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:32:15 +0900
"Paul Wise" wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Cyril Brulebois
> wrote:
> > Neil Williams (19/12/2008):
> >> - Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${xserver:Depends}
> >> + Depends: libts-0.0-0 (>= 1.0-5), ${shlibs:Depends},
> >> ${misc:Depends
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Neil Williams (19/12/2008):
>> - Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${xserver:Depends}
>> + Depends: libts-0.0-0 (>= 1.0-5), ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends},
>> ${xserver:Depends}
>
> That's ugly. Use shlibs.local (Policy §8.
Neil Williams (19/12/2008):
> I'm only mentioning this as a caution - I don't consider it a
> practical problem for these particular changes to these particular
> packages. Once Lenny is released and we migrate both tslib and the
> xorg driver into unstable and thence into testing, it would be bes
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 08:47:25 +0100
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Note, I'm only correcting the reply from Salvatore - I have no
intention of helping with the package any further or of offering any
sponsorship.
http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#lang
> I noticed that you still use Standards-Versi
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-dmidecode".
Package name : python-dmidecode
Version : 2.10-1
Upstream Author : Nima Talebi
URL : http://projects.autonomy.net.au/dmidecode/
License : GNU GPL v3
Section : python
It builds 1 binary package:
python-dmidecode - Python
16 matches
Mail list logo
