On 09/05/28 17:17 -0700, Russ Allbery said ...
> Y Giridhar Appaji Nag writes:
>
> > I am not sure if enforcing "extra" in cases other than conflicts,
> > Depends: on lower priority and very clear specialised requirements
> > (elinks-lite, debug symbols etc.) gains us much.
>
> Oh, yes, I agree.
markus schnalke wrote:
[2009-05-24 23:11] markus schnalke
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.21-6
of my package "masqmail".
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Now, someone did ... but how can I find out, who?
The mail from mentors does
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 01:48:35PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> uploaded.
---end quoted text---
Thanks !
--
أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
Digital design engineer
GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 (@ subkeys.pgp.net)
GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7
--
To UNSUB
Hello,
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 19:50, أحمد المحمودي
wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dico".
> This package is NEW to Debian. The ITP number is: 522368
>
> * Package name : dico
> Version : 2.0
> Debian Revision : 1
> Upstream Author : Serge
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag writes:
> I agree with this particular example. But I could argue if would
> "reasonbly want to install" Kerberos if I "Didn't know what it was".
>
> I've not seen ftp-master enforce the distinction between optional and
> extra, not even in the cases where it is very clearl
Thanks for taking a look at the package!
I believe I addressed all the issues correctly in the version I just
uploaded now. See below for details :)
Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
>> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> Appearances are deceptive. :-) Run a recent version of lintian with
> t
Hello,
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
> * Package name: agedu
> Version : 8442-2
> Upstream Author : Simon Tatham
> * URL : http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/agedu/
> * License : MIT
> Section : utils
>
> It builds these bin
On torsdagen den 16 april 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
> 2009/4/16 Laurent Léonard :
> > So ".dfsg" is a bad suffix ? And "+dfsg" should be used in priority ? If
> > 1.2+dfsg/1.2-dfsg/1.2dfsg sort before 1.2.1 why are there different
> > suffixes ? I don't find clear informations about that on the Debian
[Rince, 2009-05-28]
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gddrescue/gddrescue_1.10+nmu2.dsc
* shold not be a native package
* wrong distribution
* wrong version
* "Update standards and compat settings to latest sid." doesn't tell me
much about what and why changed
[stopped checking he
Hello Sven,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:01:32PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Am 28.05.2009 um 20:16 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 07:53:36PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > The reason is the following in the preinst (which I inherited, so if
> > it is wrong, I gladly rewrite/i
[2009-05-28 22:25] Y Giridhar Appaji Nag
> On 09/05/28 17:21 +0200, markus schnalke said ...
> > [2009-05-24 23:11] markus schnalke
> > >
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.21-6
> > > of my package "masqmail".
> >
> > Now, someone did ... but how can I find out, who?
> >
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "skanlite".
* Package name: skanlite
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Kåre Särs
Arseniy Lartsev
* URL : ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/4.2.3/src/extragear/
* License : GPL2+
Sect
Am 28.05.2009 um 20:16 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 07:53:36PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> I don't know why this preinst script is necessary, but if you need to
>> insure that the new update-alternatives script is run in it, you have to
>> use Pre-Depends rather than Depen
Hello Sven,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 07:53:36PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> I don't know why this preinst script is necessary, but if you need to
> insure that the new update-alternatives script is run in it, you have to
> use Pre-Depends rather than Depends. See Policy § 7.2.
Thanks, I missed th
Am 28.05.2009 um 19:34 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> I recently got an RC bug (#530653) which turned out to be a change
> in dpkg's update-alternative (the string and output channel of an
> error message was changed which is used in the preinst). So I
> prepared a new package, but this of course
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> I recently got an RC bug (#530653) which turned out to be a change
> in dpkg's update-alternative (the string and output channel of an
> error message was changed which is used in the preinst). So I
> prepared a new package, but this of c
Hello,
I recently got an RC bug (#530653) which turned out to be a change
in dpkg's update-alternative (the string and output channel of an
error message was changed which is used in the preinst). So I
prepared a new package, but this of course will only work with the
dpkg in unstable (not the o
On 09/05/28 17:21 +0200, markus schnalke said ...
> [2009-05-24 23:11] markus schnalke
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.21-6
> > of my package "masqmail".
>
> Now, someone did ... but how can I find out, who?
>
> The mail from mentors does not contain a name and I foun
markus schnalke wrote:
> [2009-05-24 23:11] markus schnalke
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.21-6
>> of my package "masqmail".
>
>> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Now, someone did ... but how can I find out, who?
>
> The mail from mentors does
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 05:21:12PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
> Now, someone did ... but how can I find out, who?
>
> The mail from mentors does not contain a name and I found no upload
> logs or a similar source.
The signature on the uploaded .dsc says it was bubulle:
gpg: Signature made Tue
[2009-05-24 23:11] markus schnalke
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.21-6
> of my package "masqmail".
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Now, someone did ... but how can I find out, who?
The mail from mentors does not contain a name and I found no u
Hi, Alexander.
On May 27 2009, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
> * Package name: agedu
> Version : 8442-2
> Upstream Author : Simon Tatham
> * URL : http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/agedu/
> * License : MIT
> Section : utils
(...)
> agedu -
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.3-1 of my
package "libdebug". This is an attempt to adopt the package,
turn it into a non-native one, become upstream, bring the Debian
packaging up to the current standards and best practices, and
fix the single outstanding bug. I
On 2009-05-28 14:38 +0200, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:24:33PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> I cannot claim to have much expertise in library packaging, but would
>> like to warn that this document gives bad advice regarding the name of
>> -dev packages. See http://bugs
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:24:33PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> I cannot claim to have much expertise in library packaging, but would
> like to warn that this document gives bad advice regarding the name of
> -dev packages. See http://bugs.debian.org/493951.
>
> In general, -dev packages should n
On 2009-05-28 14:06 +0200, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:59:35PM +0200, yo...@gmx.net wrote:
>> Can somebody point me to a step by step documentation for libraries. I can
>> only find doc for normal binary packaging. Is it possible to build lib and
>> program with one comm
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:10:52PM +0200, Yonah Brendon Franklin wrote:
> I founded this guide, but there are no commands with debuild etc. Do I don't
> need that?
Your package is still built in the normal way (see [1]) but there are
specific details you need to pay attention to when packaging lib
Hi Jonathan,
> The Debian Library Packaging Guide is best:
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
I founded this guide, but there are no commands with debuild etc. Do I don't
need that?
yonah
--
"Der Langsamste, der sein Ziel nicht aus den Augen verliert,
geht
Hi,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:59:35PM +0200, yo...@gmx.net wrote:
> Can somebody point me to a step by step documentation for libraries. I can
> only find doc for normal binary packaging. Is it possible to build lib and
> program with one command (build)?
The Debian Library Packaging Guide is be
Hello,
i'm trying to build an libary package from my sourcecode.
At first i build an regular package with dh_make and single binary included the
libary. Everything is fine and works.
Now i want to build an libary and an binary package, but as i read the manual i
can build only an libary lib-dev
Hello,
i'm trying to build an libary package from my sourcecode.
At first i build an regular package with dh_make and single binary included the
libary. Everything is fine and works.
Now i want to build an libary and an binary package, but as i read the manual i
can build only an libary lib-dev
Dear mentors,
This is a repost, since my RFS of a week ago may have slipped through
the cracks. I am looking for an inspection (and eventual sponsorship)
for my package "libfake437".
* Package name: libfake437
Version : 0.4-3
Upstream Author : Jack Kelly
* URL : libfa
On 09/05/27 13:41 -0700, Russ Allbery said ...
> Y Giridhar Appaji Nag writes:
>
> > I read that part of policy (only likely to be useful if you already
> > know what they are) as "there is an optional package that has been
> > built out of the same source package, but this one is built for
> > s
33 matches
Mail list logo
