Re: what happens if DM annual ping is late ? removed from keyring ?

Hi, On Mon, 30 May 2011, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Hi, > i reported my DM annual ping at the anniversary date, > and now i can't upload : > > Reject Reasons: > kapo...@melix.org is not in Maintainer or Uploaders of source package redmine > > is this expected until the bug report has been processed, >

Re: DEP-5 format definition hell

On 05/30/2011 08:34 PM, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote: > Why not just make it a format, e.g. require that some things must > presents here, some another must be there, but leave it relatively > free-form? > Because the goal is to stop the mess, not to reduce its amount, and also to have the copyright

Re: RFS: obdgpslogger [ITP #580176] [updated version]

Ooops, correction; I listed my work email, not my personal one. I've corrected it in the forward below, but it should be: Gary Briggs Thanks, Gary On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 03:51:38PM -0400, Gary Briggs wrote: > Dear mentors, > > A while ago I was working on packaging my pet project, obdgpslogge

RFS: obdgpslogger [ITP #580176] [updated version]

Dear mentors, A while ago I was working on packaging my pet project, obdgpslogger, for Debian. David Paleino generously uploaded it for me, but it failed the FTP masters due to a PDF without source code. [PDFs are now all gone] That was around the time Squeeze was in crunch, so I took a break fro

what happens if DM annual ping is late ? removed from keyring ?

Hi, i reported my DM annual ping at the anniversary date, and now i can't upload : Reject Reasons: kapo...@melix.org is not in Maintainer or Uploaders of source package redmine is this expected until the bug report has been processed, or am i missing something ? I feel a bit worried about that :)

Re: RFS: assogiate (updated package)

Hello, The package has been uploaded. Vincent Vincent Legout writes: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.1-2 > of my package "assogiate". > > It builds these binary packages: > assogiate - editor of the MIME file types database > > The last upload was in 2008

Re: RFS: socketcan-utils

On 30.05.2011 09:16, Markus Becker wrote: (..) >> (FYI: the PEAK driver is now maintained by Stephane Grosjean) > > In the socketcan repository? Or in the kernel? Peak had indicated that they > wanted to work with upstream. Yes. We had a discussion about that topic on Embedded World fair 2011

Re: RFS: librsync (updated package)

Andrey Rahmatullin writes: > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:27:56PM +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: >> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.7-8 >> > of my package "librsync". >> The package looks good. >> Have you found a sponsor? > Not yet. Package uploaded. Thanks for your contribution!

Re: [imagemagick] Strange bug in one of my packages need help (maybe glibc bug?)

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 02:27:28PM +0200, roucaries bastien wrote: >> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: >> > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:21:07PM +0200, roucaries bastien wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Roger Leig

Re: [imagemagick] Strange bug in one of my packages need help (maybe glibc bug?)

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 02:27:28PM +0200, roucaries bastien wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:21:07PM +0200, roucaries bastien wrote: > >> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:20:09PM +0200,

Re: [imagemagick] Strange bug in one of my packages need help (maybe glibc bug?)

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:20:09PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > see #625250 ---end quoted text--- I remember I saw something like this in Ubuntu Natty, and the reason was that the binary package was build using an old gcc, so the fix was to rebuild the binary package using the gcc in the cu

Re: DEP-5 format definition hell

Hello, On Mon, 30 May 2011 17:39:40 +0800 Thomas Goirand wrote: > > It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional > > debian/copyright. > Which format are you talking about? The "old good traditional > format" is in fact no format at all, with no rules, and we had > all sorts

Re: [imagemagick] Strange bug in one of my packages need help (maybe glibc bug?)

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:21:07PM +0200, roucaries bastien wrote: >> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: >> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:20:09PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I have two strange bug in m

Re: RFS: piwigo (uploaded)

Hi Nicolas, On 05/29/2011 02:04 PM, Nicolas wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.1-1 > of my package "piwigo". > > I used to have a mentor (Sylvain Le Gall > ) for that > package but he is disconnected from internet for a long

Junior packaging tasks within the Debian Printing Team

Dear prospective maintainers, As packaging in teams and work on specific areas of Debian is often (and rightly so) preferred to one-shot pet-package sponsoring, I would like to propose 4 "relatively easy" packaging tasks. The global goal of those packaging tasks are: * to make sure Debian pro

Re: [imagemagick] Strange bug in one of my packages need help (maybe glibc bug?)

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:21:07PM +0200, roucaries bastien wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:20:09PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have two strange bug in my package imagemagick. I am really clueless > >> about thes

Re: [imagemagick] Strange bug in one of my packages need help (maybe glibc bug?)

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:20:09PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have two strange bug in my package imagemagick. I am really clueless about >> these.upstream have no idea also. Any help welcome >> see #625250 > > % c++filt  _Z

Re: DEP-5 format definition hell

On 05/30/2011 01:46 AM, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote: > It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional > debian/copyright. > Which format are you talking about? The "old good traditional format" is in fact no format at all, with no rules, and we had all sorts of formatting, which i

Re: DEP-5 format definition hell

On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:57:29PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > Hi, > I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people > hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as > the copyright file is complete I don't think this fulfills the goal of > this DEP. >

Re: RFS: librsync (updated package)

On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:27:56PM +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.7-8 > > of my package "librsync". > The package looks good. > Have you found a sponsor? Not yet. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Re: RFS: socketcan-utils

> Hello Markus, Hello Oliver. See my comments inline: > i really appreciate your attempt to create some debian packages for the > SocketCAN utilities and the PEAK driver! > > (FYI: the PEAK driver is now maintained by Stephane Grosjean) In the socketcan repository? Or in the kernel? Peak had