On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 03:00:04AM +0200, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
> > Is the source being repackaged for DFSG reasons? If not, ‘~dfsg’ is a
> > confusing choice.
>
> VirtualBox src ships with binary *.exe, which are forbidden in Debian.
.exe file are fine, as long as they can be rebuilt with free
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
> Hello again, upstream has now released Red Eclipse 1.2 and hence this is
> partly a RFS, partly a re-review request.
...
> [1]
> Is this motivation good enough for not using stand-alone Enet?
Hmm, I don't have a good answer for that.
>
> Is the source being repackaged for DFSG reasons? If not, ‘~dfsg’ is a
> confusing choice.
VirtualBox src ships with binary *.exe, which are forbidden in Debian.
I don't know specific paragraphs of violations.
But I'm just a Debian-student, not mentor (@_@)
--
-Alexey Eromenko "Technologov"
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> I note that the package is installable on hurd-*. AFAICT Hurd doesn't
> support sound or Alsa so maybe it should not depend on 'hurd' or
> should switch to architecture linux-any (or linux-all if that
> existed)?
The kind folks on #debian-hurd p
Alexey Eromenko writes:
> Yes, you should replace inside sources, and call it ~dfsg.
Is the source being repackaged for DFSG reasons? If not, ‘~dfsg’ is a
confusing choice.
--
\ “Religious faith is the one species of human ignorance that |
`\ will not admit of even the *possibil
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
> Yes, you should replace inside sources, and call it ~dfsg.
In general it should be +dfsg not ~dfsg.
~dfsg/+dfsg should only be added when repacking for DFSG-related
reasons, so not in this case.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/Paul
2012/1/16 Björn Esser :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi there!
>
> How shall software be handled, when it needs
>
> - huge modifactions
Modify original sources in Debian.
> - scripts to be replaced by 'debianized' ones
> - to be extended by custom scripts or pr
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "oss-compat". The updated package
> adds a Multi-Arch declaration (#651335) and handles its configuration file
> according to policy (#649507, which is RC).
>
> The dsc is available at
> http://mentors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Sergey,
On 16.01.2012 23:57, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> For example, that was not "a very first upload" (of mod_rpaf) for me.
> But next time I should convince new sponsor and so on.
That's unfortunate, but this happens. I'm sorry for you, and
Marco Balmer writes:
> Dear Gergely, debian-mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "couriergrey".
Will have a look this week. Sorry for the delays.
--
|8]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
> You seem to misunderstand the DM status.
I don't think so, but thank you for explanation.
> It is not a Debian Developer
> Lite. It does not mean you, as a DM, are trusted to upload any given
> package to Debian at any time.
It just a meaningless thing for now. See below.
> If you got DM sta
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Emilien Klein wrote:
> I've worked with upstream Shaarli to fix the issue with the inclusion
> of the minified jQuery files. Upstream has released a tarball that
> uses the jQuery CDN instead of the local minified files (which have
> been removed from the archive)
2012/1/17 Björn Esser:
> I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until now.
It is not currently accepted by the Debian archive:
http://bugs.debian.org/642801
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "oss-compat". The updated package
adds a Multi-Arch declaration (#651335) and handles its configuration file
according to policy (#649507, which is RC).
The dsc is available at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/oss-compat/oss-comp
2012/1/14 Jakub Wilk :
> * Emilien Klein , 2012-01-14, 15:56:
>
>> dget -x
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shaarli/shaarli_0.0.33beta-1.dsc
>>
>> Shaarli contains the jQuery 1.6.2 minified file,
>
>
> …for which we have no source. This is violation of DFSG §2.
> (And additionally,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi there!
I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until now.
BR,
Björn.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iF4EAREIAAYFAk8Une4AC
2012/1/17 Björn Esser:
> - huge modifactions
Get those included upstream.
> - scripts to be replaced by 'debianized' ones
Make those scripts generic but configurable, send the required changes
upstream and drop in a second configuration file overriding the
defaults.
> - to be extended
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi there!
How shall software be handled, when it needs
- huge modifactions
- scripts to be replaced by 'debianized' ones
- to be extended by custom scripts or progs
when packaging it for debian?
Shall the custom / replaced stuff be pl
On 01/16/2012 07:38 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Alex Mestiashvili , 2012-01-16, 19:21:
>> Dear mentors ,
>> could you please sponsor my package libpam-abl which fixes FTBFS bug
>> #655119
>>
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc
>>
>
> The changelog says
* Alex Mestiashvili , 2012-01-16, 19:21:
Dear mentors ,
could you please sponsor my package libpam-abl which fixes FTBFS bug #655119
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc
The changelog says "debian/control added DM-Upload-Allowed", but 0.4.2-1
had a
Dear mentors ,
could you please sponsor my package libpam-abl which fixes FTBFS bug #655119
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc
Thank you ,
Alex
On 05/07/2011 04:59 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> Package name: libpam-abl
> License : GPL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Sergey,
On 16.01.2012 17:28, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> Looks like DM does not make sence at all :(
>
> I'm waiting for upload for months just in case of very
> simple changeset (e.g. for rpaf or php-memcached).
You seem to misunderstand the
> before this falls through the cracks I've uploaded the package to get
> the bug fixed.
Thank you.
>> I'm sorry, but that was noted in comments. Feel free to drop this
>> control field.
>
> Droped.
>
>> > I don't see how I can judge if you're able to handle the package or not.
>>
>> E.g. by lo
Hi,
On 01/16/2012 03:27 PM, Ivan Reche wrote:
The package is just a directory with lots of binaries and it likes to
install itself in /opt. Besides that, it needs to set some environment
variables (similar to JAVA_HOME and friends).
What is the best way to approach this? Do I change the PATH en
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:48:52PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
Hi,
before this falls through the cracks I've uploaded the package to get
the bug fixed.
> > in theory I'm willing to sponsor an upload (well I did the QA upload
> > of this package a few month ago) but I don't like people setti
This is my first post in this list and I couldn't find an older post in the
archives which answered my questions.
I need to package a commercial application for automatic installation in a
cluster, as well as not messing up the system. I want it to integrate well
with the Debian environment.
The
Hi,
On 01/16/2012 02:12 PM, Olе Streicher wrote:
When I now run "uscan -debug -f" (to check the script), I get
uscan debug: [...]
-- Found the following matching hrefs:
[...]
http://foo.bar.edu/foo/foo-1.2.3.tar.gz
Newest version on remote site is 1.2.3, local version is 1.2.3+dfsg
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:12:37 +0100, Olе Streicher wrote:
> uscan debug: [...]
> -- Found the following matching hrefs:
>[...]
> http://foo.bar.edu/foo/foo-1.2.3.tar.gz
> Newest version on remote site is 1.2.3, local version is 1.2.3+dfsg
> => remote site does not even have current versio
Hi,
I have a source that needs to be repackaged due to some copyright
issues. From the Mentors FAQ, I found that I should name the package
"foo-1.2.3+dfsg-1". So, I made a repacking script (should it have a
predefined name, btw?) like:
8<---
#!/bin/sh
ver=$2
or
Dear Gergely, debian-mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "couriergrey".
* Package name: couriergrey
Version : 0.3.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Matthias Wimmer
* URL : http://couriergrey.com
* License : GPL-2+
Section : net
On Mon, De
30 matches
Mail list logo
