I acknowledge that this is a late answer, hope it still helps.
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:45:52PM +0100, pietrop wrote:
> I am running a Debian 8 machine and I need to compile a 32 bits kernel
> using this system, I have managed to compile the kernel using the
> package linux-source-3.16 and it bo
❦ 12 août 2015 20:16 +0100, Tony Houghton :
>> Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata
>> file in #795217. It contains some outdated content so I need to change
>> it upstream.
>
> OK, 3.1.4-1 is ready now. The dget command is now:
>
> dget -x
> http://mentors.d
Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata
file in #795217. It contains some outdated content so I need to change
it upstream.
On 12/08/15 19:39, Tony Houghton wrote:
Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata
file in #795217. It contains some outdated content so I need to change
it upstream.
OK, 3.1.4-1 is ready now. The dget command is now:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.1.3-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL2+
Sectio
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2015, 14:25 -0300 schrieb Fernando Toledo:
> El 11/08/15 a las 16:31, Joachim Breitner escribió:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Sonntag, den 09.08.2015, 14:33 +0200 schrieb Felix Natter:
> > > I don't mind fixing this (in the next few days), but also see no
> > > problem in filing
El 11/08/15 a las 16:31, Joachim Breitner escribió:
> Hi,
>
> Am Sonntag, den 09.08.2015, 14:33 +0200 schrieb Felix Natter:
>> I don't mind fixing this (in the next few days), but also see no
>> problem in filing a tag=newcomer bug against devscripts
>> ("[mk-origtargz]") for fixing in debconf, me
Hello Antti,
FWIW collab-maint a.k.a. Aloith can be used
by non-DM and non-DD. Having Aloith account is enough.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
P.S.
Sorry for not replying on the e-mail of last week.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Hi mentors,
Weeks ago I intended to package linuxbrew,
the missing package manager, which is a fork of Homebrew (Mac OS X).
Linuxbrew it's Formula update is managed by git,
hence initially I found it tricky to manage original linuxbrew
with gbp tools, for these reason:
* if original linuxbrew (
PS: Just find out it is the debugging symbol taking all that space, so
I re-enable the stackprotector.
2015-08-12 16:11 GMT+08:00, Alex Vong :
> Hi Jean-Michel,
>
> Thanks for reminding me that overriding isn't safe.
>
> Now I use `DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=-stackprotector' to
> remove `
Hi Jean-Michel,
Thanks for reminding me that overriding isn't safe.
Now I use `DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=-stackprotector' to
remove `-fstack-protector-strong' since it makes the binary 10 times
the size without the flag. The DEB_*_MAINT_* seems like a better way
to manipulate flags sinc
On 2015-08-12 09:48, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>>
>
> Hi Bertrand,
>
> Neither solution will work. This is an artefact of how the testing
> migration code handles arch:all packages.
>
> Please file a bug against release.debian.org requesting help with this.
>
> Thanks,
> ~Niels
>
>
>
Ac
On 2015-08-12 09:26, Bertrand Marc wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am trying to fix Debian bug #783875 [1]: playonlinux (which is arch
> independant) should depend on the 32 bits version of wine. Therefore I
> added a dependency on wine32|wine32-development, but it seems the
> package will not migrat
Dear mentors,
I am trying to fix Debian bug #783875 [1]: playonlinux (which is arch
independant) should depend on the 32 bits version of wine. Therefore I
added a dependency on wine32|wine32-development, but it seems the
package will not migrate to testing [2], because wine32 is not available
on a
14 matches
Mail list logo
