Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2016 04:29:56 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: python-vispy/0.4.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #827273,
regarding RFS: python-vispy/0.4.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:59 AM, J.T. Conklin wrote:
> I apologize for my earlier explanation. Unfortunately I still have to
> be somewhat guarded, as there are folks who think the most important
> part of this project is the press release that will announce this to the
> world, fully formed,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newlisp"
* Package name: newlisp
Version : 10.7.0-1
Upstream Author : Lutz Mueller
* URL : http://www.newlisp.org
* License : GPL-3+,
Ok, thanks for the info. However as OBS does not provide Debian source packages
and doing it extra manually is beyond my scope, all I can do is to change the
issue from
RFS to RFP.
M.
__
> Od: Andrey Rahmatullin
>
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Paul Wise Wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:58 AM, J.T. Conklin wrote:
> > Before I go ahead with this, I'd appreciate some feedback on this
> > approach. Should we plan to use "distribution" or "component" for
> > target-specific packages. Or are we completely
done
thanks a lot for this package ;)
Fred
De : Ghislain Vaillant [ghisv...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 14 juin 2016 16:13
À : Debian Bug Tracking System
Objet : Bug#827273: RFS: python-vispy/0.4.0-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-vispy"
* Package name: python-vispy
Version : 0.4.0-1
Upstream Author : VisPy Development Team
* URL : http://vispy.org/
* License : BSD
7 matches
Mail list logo