On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:52:03AM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote:
> >> I uploaded a new package version in which the not upstreamed patches
> >> are dropped, the maintainer is set to myself and the vcs fields are
> >> updated accordingly.
> >> With #874387 Felix is searching for a new maintainer
2017-10-06 15:00 GMT+02:00 Sven Hoexter :
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 02:05:12PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote:
>> I uploaded a new package version in which the not upstreamed patches
>> are dropped, the maintainer is set to myself and the vcs fields are
>> updated accordingly.
>> With #874387 Feli
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 02:05:12PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote:
> I uploaded a new package version in which the not upstreamed patches
> are dropped, the maintainer is set to myself and the vcs fields are
> updated accordingly.
> With #874387 Felix is searching for a new maintainer for this pac
I uploaded a new package version in which the not upstreamed patches
are dropped, the maintainer is set to myself and the vcs fields are
updated accordingly.
With #874387 Felix is searching for a new maintainer for this package;
what are the requirements for me to become such?
Also, I like to ask
> You didn't even mention that bug in the changelog. What is its number?
872709 : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872709
>> and send him an email with no response.
> How long ago?
30. August
>> ITA seems to be the best fit.
> Best fit for what?
For a package update
>> In the
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 00:45:00 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:32:55PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote:
> > >> * Non-maintainer upload
> > > If it's a NMU why does the RFS subject say ITA?
> > > And why are you doing this NMU? Please read
> > > https://www.debian.org/doc
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:32:55PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote:
> >> * Non-maintainer upload
> > If it's a NMU why does the RFS subject say ITA?
> > And why are you doing this NMU? Please read
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu
> > for valid NMU reason
>>Version : 1.17-1+nmu1
> The version suffix is wrong.
Fixed
>> * Non-maintainer upload
> If it's a NMU why does the RFS subject say ITA?
> And why are you doing this NMU? Please read
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu
> for valid NMU reasons an
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 04:37:00PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote:
>Version : 1.17-1+nmu1
The version suffix is wrong.
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> vnstat (1.17-1+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Non-maintainer upload
If it's a NMU why doe
Package: sponsorship-requests
X-Debbugs-CC: fge...@debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vnstat"
* Package name: vnstat
Version : 1.17-1+nmu1
Upstream Author : Teemu Toivola
* URL : http://humdi.net/vnstat/
* License : GPL-
10 matches
Mail list logo