-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-11-25 13:16, Cristian Henzel wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> it's been almost two weeks now and I still haven't got an answer from
> the maintainer of parcellite.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>
> Henzel Cristian
>
>
Al
Hello,
it's been almost two weeks now and I still haven't got an answer from
the maintainer of parcellite.
--
Best regards,
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Henzel Cristian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-11-15 10:13, Henzel Cristian wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi
>
> so I have written an E-Mail to the original maintainer of parcellite
> more than 2 days ago and haven't got any answer yet. Should I still wait
> for an answer, or is anyone else inter
Hello,
so I have written an E-Mail to the original maintainer of parcellite
more than 2 days ago and haven't got any answer yet. Should I still wait
for an answer, or is anyone else interested in uploading this package?
--
Best regards,
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Cristian Henzel
--
To UNSUB
Hello,
> Anyhow, I had yet another look at your package; the copyright file does
> not Xyhthyx as the copyright holder of a lot of files. Even if he/she
> stopped developing on the project and you forked it, the original code
> is still (also) copyrighted by Xyhthyx.
I have fixed this in the chan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-11-12 18:32, Cristian Henzel wrote:
>> I responded on a specific point (which concerns me since I'm maintaining
>> dpkg-shlibdeps), I have not looked the rest of the package and I don't
>> intend to do it, sorry.
>>
>> Someone else should be
> I responded on a specific point (which concerns me since I'm maintaining
> dpkg-shlibdeps), I have not looked the rest of the package and I don't
> intend to do it, sorry.
>
> Someone else should be sponsoring it.
Ohh, ok then, I got you wrong.
Sorry about that. :-)
I'm still figuring out how
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote:
> > Sure, this warning is not a reason to block an upload. Many packages in
> > the archive have this kind of warnings. They are not "bugs" but things
> > that can be improved.
>
> ok, so is there anything else that I need to do, or will you upload
> Sure, this warning is not a reason to block an upload. Many packages in
> the archive have this kind of warnings. They are not "bugs" but things
> that can be improved.
ok, so is there anything else that I need to do, or will you upload it?
I have searched a bit on google, but I couldn't find a
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote:
> If it's a harmless warning and the rest of it is fine, could it get in
> the repos like this?
Sure, this warning is not a reason to block an upload. Many packages in
the archive have this kind of warnings. They are not "bugs" but things
that can be imp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-11-12 13:51, Julien Valroff wrote:
> Le vendredi 12 nov. 2010 à 13:48:01 (+0100), Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote:
>>> P.S. I find it odd that it includes the package even if there's no
>>> re
Le vendredi 12 nov. 2010 à 13:48:01 (+0100), Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote:
> > P.S. I find it odd that it includes the package even if there's no
> > referece to it and I also use -Wl,--as-needed...
>
> Maybe -Wl,--as-needed is not smart enough to
Hello,
well, I'm not sure how I could drop -lpthread. Like I said, there is no
reference to the pthread lib in any of my source files (beside the
obvious call to pthread_exit), so this must come from some of the stuff
that ./configure runs, and I am not sure how I could drop it from there.
If it
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote:
> P.S. I find it odd that it includes the package even if there's no
> referece to it and I also use -Wl,--as-needed...
Maybe -Wl,--as-needed is not smart enough to cover this case. Entirely
dropping the -lpthread is the only way to fix this apparen
Hello,
I have updated the package now and removed all of the references to
pthread.h, but it still includes it, and I have no idea why (any help on
this would be appreciated).
P.S. I find it odd that it includes the package even if there's no
referece to it and I also use -Wl,--as-needed...
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:16:08AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote:
> > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpthread.so.0 could be avoided
> > if "debian/clipit/usr/bin/clipit" were not uselessly linked against it
> > (they use none of its symbols).
>
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote:
> thanks for your reply! I have also tried removing the reference to
> pthread.h in my program, hoping that it would take the symbols from
> libc, but I still got the same warning from dpkg-shlibdeps.
> So, should I put the reference to pthread back
Hello,
thanks for your reply! I have also tried removing the reference to
pthread.h in my program, hoping that it would take the symbols from
libc, but I still got the same warning from dpkg-shlibdeps.
So, should I put the reference to pthread back in and leave it like that
(with the warning) and
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote:
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpthread.so.0 could be avoided
> if "debian/clipit/usr/bin/clipit" were not uselessly linked against it
> (they use none of its symbols).
>
> but this last one is unnecessary, because my program actually uses
>
Hello,
I have moved the autogen.sh call before dh_auto_configure and have also
managed to fix the gettext problem by replacing the gettext command with
autopoint. autopoint does basically the same thing as gettext, but
without that naging user input request.
I haven't made these changes upstream
Benoît Knecht wrote on 2010-11-11 20:44:
> > [...]
> >
> > The only problems (at least as far as I can tell) left right now are
> > that autogen.sh asks for user input when running (this is because of
> > gettext)
>
> This is indeed an issue, the build process should not require user
> input. I
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:44:47PM +0100, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Cristian Henzel wrote:
> > I have managed to get rid of the dpkg-shlibdeps warning by using the
> > flag '-Wl,--as-needed'. I have also solved the autogen.sh problem by
> > overriding dh_clean like this:
> >
>
Hi again,
Cristian Henzel wrote:
> I have managed to get rid of the dpkg-shlibdeps warning by using the
> flag '-Wl,--as-needed'. I have also solved the autogen.sh problem by
> overriding dh_clean like this:
>
> override_dh_clean:
> dh_clean
> ./autogen.sh
You should override dh_auto
Sorry, sending the message again because I forgot to cc
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org.
Hello,
I have managed to get rid of the dpkg-shlibdeps warning by using the
flag '-Wl,--as-needed'. I have also solved the autogen.sh problem by
overriding dh_clean like this:
override_dh_clean:
dh
Benoît Knecht wrote:
> Cristian Henzel wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clipit".
> >
> > * Package name: clipit
> > Version : 1.2.1-1
> > Upstream Author : Cristian Henzel
> > * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtkclipit/
> > * License
Cristian Henzel wrote:
> I have managed to fix almost all of the problems, beside two. The first
> one being the "dpkg-shlibdeps" warnings. I cannot figure out where they
> come from. When I created the control file, I have only put as
> dependency the following things:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (
Hello,
I have managed to fix almost all of the problems, beside two. The first
one being the "dpkg-shlibdeps" warnings. I cannot figure out where they
come from. When I created the control file, I have only put as
dependency the following things:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), libgtk2.0-d
El dj 11 de 11 de 2010 a les 12:52 +0100, en/na Alexander
Reichle-Schmehl va escriure:
> HI!
>
> Am 11.11.2010 12:48, schrieb Mònica Ramírez Arceda:
>
> > * Lintian: W: clipit source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4
> > (current is 3.9.1)
> > You should change this version in debian/contr
HI!
Am 11.11.2010 12:48, schrieb Mònica Ramírez Arceda:
> * Lintian: W: clipit source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4
> (current is 3.9.1)
> You should change this version in debian/control file
I think you mean the right thing, but for the sake of clarity: One
should not only bump t
Ooops!
El dj 11 de 11 de 2010 a les 11:02 +0100, en/na Benoît Knecht va
escriure:
> Hi Cristian,
>
> Cristian Henzel wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clipit".
> >
> > * Package name: clipit
> > Version : 1.2.1-1
> > Upstream Author : Cr
Hi,
El dj 11 de 11 de 2010 a les 10:45 +0200, en/na Cristian Henzel va
escriure:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clipit".
>
> * Package name: clipit
> Version : 1.2.1-1
> Upstream Author : Cristian Henzel
> * URL : http://sourceforge.ne
Hi Cristian,
Cristian Henzel wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clipit".
>
> * Package name: clipit
> Version : 1.2.1-1
> Upstream Author : Cristian Henzel
> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtkclipit/
> * License : G
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clipit".
* Package name: clipit
Version : 1.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Cristian Henzel
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtkclipit/
* License : GPLv3
Section : misc
It builds these binary p
33 matches
Mail list logo
