Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-15 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
2009/6/13 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. : > The (unversioned, build-time use only) symlink libiulib.so -> > libiulib.so.0.0.0 needs to be in libiulib-dev package.  The (major- > versioned) symlink libiulib.so.0 -> libiulib.so.0.0.0 needs to be in the > libuilib0 package. Thanks for this. I have now uplo

Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > Why is it a static library instead of a shared one? PS: libpkg-guide is a good shared library packaging reference, but be aware of the two bugs filed against it. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb

Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-12 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <30e395780906121522i273d74b8qe6bf4f35198e4...@mail.gmail.com>, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: >Now it is not lintian clean. If I have the usr/lib/libiulib.so.0.0.0 >libiulib.so.0 symlinks in libiulib0, then I get: > >W: libiulib0: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libiulib.so.0.0.0 >usr/lib/libi

Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-12 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
2009/6/12 Paul Wise : > Why is it a static library instead of a shared one? Because that's how upstream set up the build process, and neither upstream, nor I, knew enough about autoconf, automake and libtool to make a shared library. In the mean time, someone posted a working patch[1], and I have

Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Please someone sponsor it. I've already reviewed the package some time > ago, but I step back since I'm not sure about this library package, in > particular because it's a static lib one. Why is it a static library instead of a shared one? -

Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-12 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 16:15, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > 2009/6/10 Salvatore Bonaccorso : >> I shortly looked into it, you seem to use a "unmodified" tiny >> debian/rule. You should minimize this, by using only a >> mini-debian/rule and depend in debian/control on (debhelper >= 7.0.8, >> please ch

Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-12 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
2009/6/10 Salvatore Bonaccorso : > I shortly looked into it, you seem to use a "unmodified" tiny > debian/rule. You should minimize this, by using only a > mini-debian/rule and depend in debian/control on (debhelper >= 7.0.8, > please check the correct version in changelog of debhelper) - it will

Re: RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-09 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Jeffrey First, I'm not a DD! On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:42:00PM +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iulib". > > * Package name: iulib > Version : 0.3-1 > Upstream Author : Thomas Breuel > * URL : http://code

RFS: iulib (2nd attempt)

2009-06-09 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iulib". * Package name: iulib Version : 0.3-1 Upstream Author : Thomas Breuel * URL : http://code.google.com/p/iulib/ * License : Apache-2.0 Section : graphics It builds these binary packages: lib