Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-19 Thread Andreas Hoenen
Leo \costela\ Antunes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ Now there's just one last minor problem: since you closed some bugs on 0.2.8-1 which never got uploaded, you would have to close them manually as the automatic bug handling wouldn't be triggered for them. I don't know if there's anything

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-19 Thread Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:12:03PM +0100, Andreas Hoenen wrote: I don't know if there's anything on mentors.d.o that stops you from doing this, but I'd personally say you don't need to bump versions before the package actually gets into the archive, so you could just stick with '-1' for a

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-19 Thread Leo costela Antunes
Andreas Hoenen wrote: I rememer a thread on this mailing list starting with [1] that discussed the issue of reusing the same version number for different uploads to mentors.debian.net. Most participants agreed to use a new version number for each upload. I like this approach, as m.d.n. is

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-18 Thread Leo costela Antunes
Andreas Hoenen wrote: I have just uploaded dblatex 0.2.8-2 to mentors.debian.net [1]. Regarding the new lintian warning 'spelling-error-in-changelog' I have opened a bug report [2]. [1] dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dblatex/dblatex_0.2.8-2.dsc Now there's just one

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-18 Thread Felipe Sateler
Leo costela Antunes wrote: Andreas Hoenen wrote: I have just uploaded dblatex 0.2.8-2 to mentors.debian.net [1]. Regarding the new lintian warning 'spelling-error-in-changelog' I have opened a bug report [2]. [1] dget

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-18 Thread Leo costela Antunes
Felipe Sateler wrote: This can be triggered with the -v option to dpkg-buildpackage Live and learn. Never noticed that one before! :-) Uploading. Cheers -- Leo costela Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-18 Thread Matthias Julius
Leo \costela\ Antunes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andreas Hoenen wrote: I have just uploaded dblatex 0.2.8-2 to mentors.debian.net [1]. Regarding the new lintian warning 'spelling-error-in-changelog' I have opened a bug report [2]. [1] dget

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-16 Thread Andreas Hoenen
Andreas Hoenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leo \costela\ Antunes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ After you take a look at these issues (or just justify them) I can sponsor you, if no one with more expertise in this sort of package pops up until - let's say - monday. snip/ If there doesn't

RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-15 Thread Andreas Hoenen
if someone could sponsor the new version. Thanks, Andreas --- Forwarded Message From: Andreas Hoenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org cc: Lucas Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RFS: dblatex (updated package) X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; nmh 1.2; GNU Emacs 22.1.1 MIME-Version

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-15 Thread Nicolas Weyland
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 10:51:47 +0100 Andreas Hoenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello what shall I say for advertisement? I think dblatex is not an unimportant package, AFAIK it's the only free, working DocBook-PDF tool in Debian. Moreover, the current Debian version (0.2.6-1) is quite outdated

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-15 Thread Leo costela Antunes
Andreas Hoenen wrote: what shall I say for advertisement? I think dblatex is not an unimportant package, AFAIK it's the only free, working DocBook-PDF tool in Debian. Moreover, the current Debian version (0.2.6-1) is quite outdated as sadly 0.2.7-1 did not get sponsored. Thus I would

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-15 Thread Russ Allbery
Leo \costela\ Antunes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - I'm not sure the lintian override for the changelog line length is necessary; you could just mention bug # on the sourceforge tracker. Using the override could mask a future line length issue, and even though this is certainly something minor,

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

2007-12-15 Thread Andreas Hoenen
Leo \costela\ Antunes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Leo, thank you very much for your feedback. It seems that another pair of eyes is likely to detect issues that have gone unnoticed for a long time... snip/ I am fairly inexperienced with docbook and python policy, but here are a few

RFS: dblatex (updated package)

2007-12-08 Thread Andreas Hoenen
Dear mentors, as my default sponsor seems to be overloaded at the moment, I am looking for an one time sponsor for the new version 0.2.8-1 of my package dblatex. It builds these binary packages: dblatex- Produces DVI, PostScript, PDF documents from DocBook sources The package appears to be