Hello Nanakos,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:05:41AM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
> On 17 Σεπ 2012, at 7:37, Bart Martens wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:06:51PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
> >>I hope my last message covers your questions.
> >I currently see on bug 685679 only the
Dear Bart,
On 17 Σεπ 2012, at 7:37, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:06:51PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
Hi Bart,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:08:18PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
Hi Nanakos,
I had a look at mpg321 at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-27
09:13.
It
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:06:51PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:08:18PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > Hi Nanakos,
> >
> > I had a look at mpg321 at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-27 09:13.
> >
> > It is
Hi Bart,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:08:18PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Nanakos,
>
> I had a look at mpg321 at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-27 09:13.
>
> It is not clear to me on bug 685679 what you mean with "does not perform very
> well" and "not ve
Dear Bart,
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 19:08:18 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Nanakos,
>
> I had a look at mpg321 at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-27 09:13.
>
> It is not clear to me on bug 685679 what you mean with "does not perform
> very
> well" and "not
Hi Nanakos,
I had a look at mpg321 at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-27 09:13.
It is not clear to me on bug 685679 what you mean with "does not perform very
well" and "not very stable". I don't see how this makes "mpg321 unusable" and
how it would "br
6 matches
Mail list logo