On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Upps. I don't have the info about the replacement.
>
> This info and the RM bug are not on the PTS.
The RM bug should be mentioned on the PTS but isn't, that seems like a
bug. Since we are transitioning the PTS to the package tracker, th
Hello Paul,
thank you for your answer.
Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2014, 12:10 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>
> > What is the best way to stop this and the blocking bugs?
>
> Personally I don't understand your motivation for wanting to mainta
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> What is the best way to stop this and the blocking bugs?
Personally I don't understand your motivation for wanting to maintain
tslib (evdev should replace it), but if you don't think the package
should be removed, you should close the RM
Hello,
at the moment I'm working on tslib to adopt the package.
I see that there is a RM bug[1] for tslib.
I would like to continue working on it, hence my question:
What is the best way to stop this and the blocking bugs?
CU
Jörg
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=75176
4 matches
Mail list logo