Re: Debian hardware certification

2011-07-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Philip Hands wrote: > That seems like a good idea -- how about if we encouraged willing hardware > manufacturers to maintain a pseudo package type thing, perhaps per > device, although it would be good to have some sort of wild-card so that > one could report a bug

Re: Debian hardware certification

2011-07-05 Thread Philip Hands
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:23:56 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > That's the kind of very simple list that I was hoping to build. But the > > list isn't the final goal. The goal is to *fix* issues when we see them, > > like it happened for the X8S

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf9/10[/11] accounting summary

2011-07-05 Thread Richard Darst
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 10:29:44AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > DebConf 9 had €95715.65 income, €61130.10 expenses, for a net gain of > > €34585.55. DC9 "took" €9960.17 from Debian (mostly at SPI; Debian > > allocated USD20k when the budget looked bad), used €462.00 of DC8 > > surplus. D