Re: Bug#886291: Debian package transition: Rename package and reuse old name with new content

On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 at 16:31:37 +0200, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > To fix #886291, we should: > - Rename python3-pycryptodome to python3-pycryptodomex > - Reuse python3-pycryptodome package name to package a non compatible > python3 module. > > The rationale of this rename + reuse is that currently, >

Re: RFS: pcapy/0.11.3-1 [ITA]

On Saturday, August 11 2018, eamanu wrote: > Hello Sergio! > > Thanks for your comments! No problem, and sorry for the delay. > 1) On d/copyright, the license specified for the project is wrong. >> According to the LICENSE file, the project is released under a slightly >> modified version of the