Hello,
I created an ITP for Nuitka here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648489
Should I add some link to the debian packages there?
1. The dch is not picking up my email address, unlike reportbug,
kind of annoying.
Solved.
2. I would like to remove the inline_copy
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 09:48:21AM +0100, Kay Hayen wrote:
I also renamed the act alike python binary /usr/bin/Python to
/usr/bin/nuitka-python as a result of the review.
Nice.
So that is it, I don't know anymore of things to do. What about a
manpage, is it considered mandatory?
It
I wrote:
Anybody has any experience with generating manpages from optparse?
[...]
If anybody does that already, people on this list likely know.
Looking at cything, I found help2man, which is what cython package uses,
great stuff. Of course, no need to be any Python specific.
Yours,
Hello,
So that is it, I don't know anymore of things to do. What about a
manpage, is it considered mandatory?
The man page exists and even has an examples section added for the
typical use cases. I am totally surprised at how easy that was. An
absolute thumbs up to help2man from here,
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:50:13PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Paul Boddie p...@boddie.org.uk, 2011-11-12, 15:08:
c) I renamed Nuitka.py to a nuitka binary. I am keeping the
drop-in replacement as Python though.
I don't think it's wise to call it Python,
Agreed, this is bad idea.
+1
Hello Nicolas,
you wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:50:13PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Paul Boddiep...@boddie.org.uk, 2011-11-12, 15:08:
c) I renamed Nuitka.py to a nuitka binary. I am keeping the
drop-in replacement as Python though.
I don't think it's wise to call it Python,
Agreed,
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:59:56PM +0100, Kay Hayen wrote:
Oh collective Debian-Python Brainpower, tell me a good name but
nuitka for said binary. :-)
Reading the doc I understand that Python == Nuitka.py --execute.
Am I correct ?
Maybe Python + nuitka -- nuitka + nuitka-ctl
Or
Hello Nicolas,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:59:56PM +0100, Kay Hayen wrote:
Oh collective Debian-Python Brainpower, tell me a good name but
nuitka for said binary. :-)
Reading the doc I understand that Python == Nuitka.py --execute.
Am I correct ?
It's --exe and --exectute, but yes, it
On 15 November 2011 23:49, Kay Hayen kayha...@gmx.de wrote:
Hm, what about nuitka-python as a binary name of what is now Python, is
that OK? It seems the readable variant.
nuitka-python is what I'd call it, from your description. I'm not actually
a Debian packager, though.
Thomas
Hello Stefano,
Am 12.11.2011 22:16, schrieb Stefano Rivera:
Hi Kay (2011.11.12_23:01:43_+0200)
More or less stolen from /usr/bin/hg which does something similar.
I have hooked distutils to modify the scripts and replace @LIBDIR@
for the binary distributions.
I disabled that in mercurial in
* Paul Boddie p...@boddie.org.uk, 2011-11-12, 15:08:
c) I renamed Nuitka.py to a nuitka binary. I am keeping the
drop-in replacement as Python though.
I don't think it's wise to call it Python,
Agreed, this is bad idea.
If Nuitka aims to be a Python alternative, shouldn't it use the
11 matches
Mail list logo
