Re: Time for a new maintainer for Auctex?

2009-08-14 Thread Jonathan Yu
Hi: On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote: >>  DB == David Bremner [2009-8-14] > > > [...] > > DB> I don't think that any of this changes my major point, which is that > DB> the package at least seems abandoned by its maintainer(s). I would > DB> be quite happy to be cor

Re: Time for a new maintainer for Auctex?

2009-08-14 Thread Davide G. M. Salvetti
> DB == David Bremner [2009-8-14] [...] DB> I don't think that any of this changes my major point, which is that DB> the package at least seems abandoned by its maintainer(s). I would DB> be quite happy to be corrected on this point. Hi, please, stand corrected, as I intend to keep auctex

Re: Time for a new maintainer for Auctex?

2009-08-14 Thread David Bremner
Cyril Brulebois wrote: >[1 ] >David Bremner (13/08/2009): >> I guess two of the NMUs are internationalization issues, so I don't >> really how indicative they are of lack of maintanence. On the other >> hand, the package has 22 lintian warnings, and sits at policy 3.7.2, >> which makes it likel

Re: Time for a new maintainer for Auctex?

2009-08-14 Thread Cyril Brulebois
David Bremner (13/08/2009): > I guess two of the NMUs are internationalization issues, so I don't > really how indicative they are of lack of maintanence. On the other > hand, the package has 22 lintian warnings, and sits at policy 3.7.2, > which makes it likely to have some RC bugs. Don't talk