Hi,
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 10:16, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
When a package has one 'patched' bug, the PTS now displays:
The Bug Tracking System contains patches fixing 1 bug, you should include
Actually I'm always slightly annoyed when I see this. A computer should not
tell anyone what to
On ti, 2008-02-19 at 11:23 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
And as this isn't always right, I suggest to use a less strong wording. You
should look at.. or You could include. Or whatever. But _all_ those
patches should definitly _not_ be included.
I concur, although I suggest that the wording
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
When a package has one 'patched' bug, the PTS now displays:
The Bug Tracking System contains patches fixing 1 bug, you should include .
as seen e.g. here: http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sword.html
Attached patch restores the word it, that
On 19/02/2008, Holger Levsen wrote:
Actually I'm always slightly annoyed when I see this. A computer should not
tell anyone what to do, unless its 100% right.
And as this isn't always right, I suggest to use a less strong wording. You
should look at.. or You could include. Or whatever. But
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:55:32PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I concur, although I suggest that the wording could say that if the
patch is inappropriate, the patch tag should be removed.
No objection, but please someone come up with an appropriate wording. I
will include it, but please don't
On ti, 2008-02-19 at 13:39 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:55:32PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I concur, although I suggest that the wording could say that if the
patch is inappropriate, the patch tag should be removed.
No objection, but please someone come up
On ti, 2008-02-19 at 14:14 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 11:55, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On ti, 2008-02-19 at 11:23 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
And as this isn't always right, I suggest to use a less strong wording.
You should look at.. or You could include. Or
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 11:55, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On ti, 2008-02-19 at 11:23 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
And as this isn't always right, I suggest to use a less strong wording.
You should look at.. or You could include. Or whatever. But _all_
those patches should definitly _not_ be
Hi,
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 14:14, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
The Bug Tracking System contains patches fixing 3 bugs, you should
consider including them or removing the patch tag from the bugs.
Wonderful :)
regards,
Holger
pgp8kk8GN53tc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 14:29, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Perhaps The Bug Tracking System contains patches fixing 3 bugs, you
should consider including or untagging them. then? Two additional
words. :)
Patch updated :-)
Thijs
Index: pts/www/xsl/pts.xsl
Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Bug Tracking System contains patches fixing 3 bugs, you should
consider including them or removing the patch tag from the bugs.
Slightly more idiomatic:
X bugs in the Bug Tracking System are tagged as having patches.
Either they should be
11 matches
Mail list logo