reassign 576240 qa.debian.org
thanks
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 07:20:49PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> reassign 576240 wnpp
> thanks
>
> On Fri, 02 Apr 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> > Gentlemen, nowhere in e.g.,
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576184
> > http://article.g
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 07:50:25PM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> AG> I consider the link in the bottom of the pages to the BTS help page
> AG> enought explanation.
> I challenge you to show how a non Debian insider will go from some ITP bug
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=.
Well, OK, I hope the Google result doesn't somehow point to something
different someday. All I can offer is http://www.useit.com/alertbox/ as
a tip for making clear websites.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
AG> I consider the link in the bottom of the pages to the BTS help page
AG> enought explanation.
I challenge you to show how a non Debian insider will go from some ITP bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=...
to the web page that contains the answer for what ITP means, without
throw
FWIW:
1. If the BTS is going to be modified to display some alt text, then the bug
should be reassigned to debbugs.
2. The wnpp BTS page already displays the complete text of each abbreviation.
(not sure if it is possible to for example remove the "Outstanding bugs" part,
@owner?)
Cheers,
--
On Mittwoch, 7. April 2010, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > http://www.google.com/search?q=site:bugs.debian.org+ITP
> > which won't get him far. He needs to use
> Since you insist in using google...
> http://www.google.com/search?q=debian+ITP
I believe our webpages should be sulf sustained and understanda
Holger Levsen (08/04/2010):
> I believe our webpages should be self sustained and understandable
> without external parties.
Like by typing “ITP” in the “search” box on http://www.debian.org/
which leads to http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.*.html pages?
That makes me think we're performing
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 8. April 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Holger Levsen (08/04/2010):
> > I believe our webpages should be self sustained and understandable
> > without external parties.
>
> Like by typing “ITP” in the “search” box on http://www.debian.org/
> which leads to http://www.debian.org
Holger Levsen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 8. April 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Holger Levsen (08/04/2010):
I believe our webpages should be self sustained and understandable
without external parties.
Like by typing “ITP” in the “search” box on http://www.debian.org/
which leads to http://www.debi
Hi,
A low cost solution could be to modify reportbug to produce the sentence "I
intend to package this software".
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://
Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> If I look at the results at http://search.debian.org/?q=itp I roll my eyes
> and go away, sorry. As much as I'm impressed^wsurprised the search does
> something again, I'm totally unimpressed by those search results.
>
See for more info:
http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfC
On Donnerstag, 8. April 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2010/ImprovementsToDebianSearch
nice!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 576240 qa.debian.org
Bug #576240 [wnpp] say what ITP means right there in the report
Bug reassigned from package 'wnpp' to 'qa.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
13 matches
Mail list logo