Re: Ssh2-packet still secure?

2003-09-16 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
[ccing to debian-devel] Hi Johan! You wrote: > I use ssh2 (2.0.13-7) on my webserver. As far as I can see this packet has > not been updated since Sat, 15 Dec 2001 12:43:25 +. My question is if > this packet is still considered secure and reliable to use after all > OpenSSH-bugs, since it's

libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1_i386.changes is NEW

2003-09-16 Thread Debian Installer
(new) libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1.diff.gz optional non-free/perl (new) libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1.dsc optional non-free/perl (new) libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1_i386.deb optional non-free/perl WARNING: Already present in main distribution. Platform independent mailing list module Mail::Bulkmail

Re: Ssh2-packet still secure?

2003-09-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:32:00PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 08:38:39PM +0200, Johan C wrote: > > I use ssh2 (2.0.13-7) on my webserver. As far as I can see this packet has > > not been updated since Sat, 15 Dec 2001 12:43:25 +. My question is if > > this packet is st

Re: Ssh2-packet still secure?

2003-09-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 08:38:39PM +0200, Johan C wrote: > I use ssh2 (2.0.13-7) on my webserver. As far as I can see this packet has > not been updated since Sat, 15 Dec 2001 12:43:25 +. My question is if > this packet is still considered secure and reliable to use after all > OpenSSH-bugs, si

Processing of libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1_i386.changes

2003-09-16 Thread James Troup
libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to auric.debian.org along with the files: libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1.dsc libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09.orig.tar.gz libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1.diff.gz libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queu

Ssh2-packet still secure?

2003-09-16 Thread Johan C
Hey, I use ssh2 (2.0.13-7) on my webserver. As far as I can see this packet has not been updated since Sat, 15 Dec 2001 12:43:25 +. My question is if this packet is still considered secure and reliable to use after all OpenSSH-bugs, since it's not updated for almost 2 years, or is that because

Bug#211249: default /etc/cron.d/cacti does not work

2003-09-16 Thread Oliver Zimmermann
Package: cacti Version: 0.6.8a-13.1 Severity: normal By default there is in /etc/cron.d/cacti: */5 * * * * www-data php4 /usr/share/cacti/cmd.php > /dev/null 2>&1 This doesn't work, because php4 is not startet in the right directory. To succeed I had to change it like this: */5 * * * * www-data c