ok, written. not especially nice, but written.
http://finbar.dyndns.org/~tgs/deb/
it does not ask me the question, i'm not sure if that's because i have
my priority set to high or if it's actually broken. so, go ahead and
test... have fun, and thank you.
thomas
--
Thomas "resc" Smith <[EMAIL
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 02:27:51AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any progress with this cgiemail bug? If you've got the debconf stuff
> written, I could test it if that would help ...
I worked on it significantly today, and will finish it tomorrow. This
is my spring break, so I finally hav
Hi,
Any progress with this cgiemail bug? If you've got the debconf stuff
written, I could test it if that would help ...
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:19:49PM -0500, Thomas Smith wrote:
> I thought of a way not to break compatability: if there's no config
> file, have it act like it did before.
>
> Here's a patch.
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought of a way not to break compatability: if there's no config
file, have it act like it did before.
Here's a patch.
--- tmp/cgiemail-1.6/cgilib.c Tue Feb 12 17:09:45 2002
+++ cgiemail-1.6/cgilib.c Tue Feb 12 17:08:32 2002
@@ -475,15 +475,7 @@
cfp = fopen(TEMPLATECONF, "r");
i
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:54:06PM -0500, Thomas Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 04:42:42PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Yes, with the current design there really isn't any way to do it well
> > (including backwards compatibility), only patch it up. I suggest a
> > simple 'templatedir="/fo
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 04:42:42PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:17:25PM -0500, Thomas Smith wrote:
> > Hmm, one problem that just occurred to me is that we can't easily make
> > the location of the template files a compile-time option because people
> > reconfigure their
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:17:25PM -0500, Thomas Smith wrote:
> I had released a new version with an almost-correct fix for the buffer
> overflow problem last night, and just looked at your mail to the bug
> this afternoon. My fix was almost the same as yours; it used
> CGI_ERRMSG_MAX-1 instead of
Hello, thank you for helping/offering to help!
I had released a new version with an almost-correct fix for the buffer
overflow problem last night, and just looked at your mail to the bug
this afternoon. My fix was almost the same as yours; it used
CGI_ERRMSG_MAX-1 instead of CGI_ERRMSG_MAX. My n
9 matches
Mail list logo
