Ubuntu already linked soprano against libvirtodbc0 rather than
libiodbc2.Since it isn't libodbc1, do you think it is still bad?
And why is Steve's patch dirty?
Here on Debian wheezy, I needed to "fix" libmyodbc dependencies using
ubuntu package, which is much more dirty since I cannot update sopran
I'm also getting these messages, so perhaps I can help troubleshoot.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201206011920.19480.j...@bordenrhodes.com
Hi all,
I just came by this when running today's updates.
kbuildsycoca4 running...
kbuildsycoca4(28131)/kdecore (services)
KServicePrivate::init: The desktop entry file
"/usr/share/applications/usbview.desktop" has Type=
"Applications/System/Hardware" instead of "Applicat
Package: akregator
Version: 4:4.4.11.1+l10n-2
Severity: normal
Akregator crasheѕ when quiting the program. This happens both when running
standalone or embeded in kontact. Below is the output from the kde crash handler
for a crash when akregator is embeded in kontact:
Application: kontact (4.4.11
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 671391 -pending
Bug #671391 [kde-runtime] kde-runtime: Nepomuk should depend on virtuoso
Bug #671944 [kde-runtime] kde-runtime: Virtuoso entirely missing from testing,
making
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #671391 to the same tags pre
5 matches
Mail list logo