Re: Fwd: Do I need specific binary package relationships in this case ?

On 15/01/15 19:12, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > 2015-01-15 17:39 GMT+00:00 Jose Luis Rivero >: > > Hello Ghislain: > > On 15/01/15 18:27, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I am currently packaging an update of libnfft. The ne

Fwd: Do I need specific binary package relationships in this case ?

2015-01-15 17:39 GMT+00:00 Jose Luis Rivero : > Hello Ghislain: > > On 15/01/15 18:27, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I am currently packaging an update of libnfft. The new version brings > > along support for multi-precision, which means more binaries can be > > created and a t

Re: Do I need specific binary package relationships in this case ?

Hello Ghislain: On 15/01/15 18:27, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am currently packaging an update of libnfft. The new version brings > along support for multi-precision, which means more binaries can be > created and a transition should be occuring between the old and new > packag

Do I need specific binary package relationships in this case ?

Hi everyone, I am currently packaging an update of libnfft. The new version brings along support for multi-precision, which means more binaries can be created and a transition should be occuring between the old and new package layout. Version 3.2 is currently in the archive and provides: - libnff