Re: Maintaining a package (JASP)

2018-02-12 Thread Boris Pek
> Use mailing list [1] for discussions with team members. Some info about > joining to Debian Science team you may find at [2]. Also have in mind that > git repositories for our packages were recently moved from Alioth [3][4] to > Salsa [5], and I am not sure that our documentation have been update

Re: Help needed with dbgsym package: yorick_2.2.04+dfsg1-7_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-02-12 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 12/02/2018 à 13:35, Sébastien Villemot a écrit : Hi Thibaut, On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 01:27:00PM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote: I recently tried to convert a package from the old, manual -dbg package scheme to the new, automatic -dbgsym package scheme. I get this reject, below. Do you have an

Re: Maintaining a package (JASP)

2018-02-12 Thread Boris Pek
Hi Joris, > I am a member of the core team of JASP, we develop a GPL'd statistics > program that aims to replace SPSS while adding bayesian statics to the mix. > We would like to make this as widely available as possible and therefore > would like to contribute it to the debian repositories. > > T

Re: Help needed with dbgsym package: yorick_2.2.04+dfsg1-7_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-02-12 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Hi Thibaut, On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 01:27:00PM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > I recently tried to convert a package from the old, manual -dbg package > scheme to the new, automatic -dbgsym package scheme. I get this reject, > below. Do you have any clue what I'm doing wrong? > > Le 07/02/2018 à

Help needed with dbgsym package: yorick_2.2.04+dfsg1-7_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-02-12 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Dear fellow developpers, I recently tried to convert a package from the old, manual -dbg package scheme to the new, automatic -dbgsym package scheme. I get this reject, below. Do you have any clue what I'm doing wrong? Le 07/02/2018 à 11:22, Debian FTP Masters a écrit : yorick-dbgsym_2.2.04

Re: RFS: opencascade/7.2.0-1 [ITP]

2018-02-12 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Kurt, Just a short review. I did not test the package. But some stuff should be fixed before it will be uploaded. As I understand you want to maintain the package under the umbrella of debian science team? If so, please fix some corresponding fields (maintaner etc) in d/control. = 1. sour