Re: recent gpm DoS issue

2000-07-29 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 02:41:51PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 03:37:30AM +, Jim Breton wrote: > > > > Yup. Until we have a package which sets restricted permissions on its > > own, when it creates the socket. :-{ > > we we could just fix the DoS in gpm, no? i just

Re: recent gpm DoS issue

2000-07-29 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 03:37:30AM +, Jim Breton wrote: > > Yup. Until we have a package which sets restricted permissions on its > own, when it creates the socket. :-{ we we could just fix the DoS in gpm, no? -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpBUWm6B9m9K.pgp Descriptio

Re: recent gpm DoS issue

2000-07-29 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 02:41:51PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 03:37:30AM +, Jim Breton wrote: > > > > Yup. Until we have a package which sets restricted permissions on its > > own, when it creates the socket. :-{ > > we we could just fix the DoS in gpm, no? i jus

Re: recent gpm DoS issue

2000-07-29 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 03:37:30AM +, Jim Breton wrote: > > Yup. Until we have a package which sets restricted permissions on its > own, when it creates the socket. :-{ we we could just fix the DoS in gpm, no? -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ PGP signature