On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 02:41:51PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 03:37:30AM +, Jim Breton wrote:
> >
> > Yup. Until we have a package which sets restricted permissions on its
> > own, when it creates the socket. :-{
>
> we we could just fix the DoS in gpm, no?
i just
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 03:37:30AM +, Jim Breton wrote:
>
> Yup. Until we have a package which sets restricted permissions on its
> own, when it creates the socket. :-{
we we could just fix the DoS in gpm, no?
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
pgpBUWm6B9m9K.pgp
Descriptio
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 02:41:51PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 03:37:30AM +, Jim Breton wrote:
> >
> > Yup. Until we have a package which sets restricted permissions on its
> > own, when it creates the socket. :-{
>
> we we could just fix the DoS in gpm, no?
i jus
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 03:37:30AM +, Jim Breton wrote:
>
> Yup. Until we have a package which sets restricted permissions on its
> own, when it creates the socket. :-{
we we could just fix the DoS in gpm, no?
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
PGP signature
4 matches
Mail list logo